menu_open Yazarlar
QOSHE'nin özellik ve deneyimlerinden faydalanabilmeniz için çerez kullanıyoruz.

Daha fazla bilgi  .  Kapat

Benazir Bhutto’s Assassination And Pakistan’s Enduring Culture Of Political Violence

26 1
29.12.2025

In Pakistan’s politics, the most consequential disagreements rarely end at negotiating tables. They end instead in courtrooms without verdicts, in prisons without closure, and at graves without accountability. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan’s first female prime minister and one of the most prominent democratic leaders in the Muslim world, was one such ending, not merely because it silenced a former prime minister, but because it exposed a political culture that continues to resolve disagreement without coexistence.

Benazir Bhutto was assassinated on 27 December 2007, in a gun-and-bomb attack after addressing an election rally in Rawalpindi. Just weeks earlier, she had survived a suicide bombing in Karachi that killed at least 123 people, one of the deadliest attacks in the country’s history. She was neither the first nor the last major political figure to be violently removed from Pakistan’s political stage.

Pakistan’s first prime minister, Liaquat Ali Khan, was shot dead at a public meeting in Rawalpindi in 1951. Between these two deaths lie other forms of political elimination: the judicial execution of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the unexplained circumstances surrounding the death of leaders such as H.S. Suhrawardy, and the sudden demise of General Zia-ul-Haq in a plane crash that itself generated decades of suspicion. Together, they reflect a system that has struggled to resolve political conflict through institutions alone.

Political assassination in Pakistan has rarely been treated as a moral or systemic failure. Instead, it is routinely reduced to questions of security lapses or intelligence breakdowns. This framing misses the point. What these episodes expose is a deeper ethical collapse, a political order in which opponents are not seen as legitimate actors, but as threats to be neutralised. In mature political systems, even deeply polarising leaders are expected to lose power without losing life or liberty, returning to public life through elections, memoirs, or retirement rather than courts or graves. In Pakistan, politics has often operated on a more absolutist logic: that one side’s survival depends on the other’s removal.

© The Friday Times