Centrism is not indecision, but a conscious rejection of the emotional trauma, institutional decay and social fragmentation that result from ideological extremes. This is increasingly visible across democracies worldwide. Public discourse has become structured less around policy and more around outrage. Political tribes increasingly define themselves not merely by what they support, but by whom they hate. Under such conditions, centrism is attacked precisely because it refuses to participate in this emotional absolutism.

In periods of political polarisation, moderation is frequently mistaken for opportunism. Yet history had repeatedly demonstrated that societies rarely collapse because they lacked ideological purity; they collapse when competing ideologies are determined to eradicate their opposition. Both extremes begin as visions of justice and social good, ultimately descend into exclusion, hostility, and perpetual mobilisation against an “enemy.” In both cases, politics becomes an instrument of emotional warfare. Centrism is fidelity to a higher principle: Governments and systems of governance exist not to vindicate rigid ideology, but to preserve society, protect liberty, ensure stability, and improve human life while accommodating diverse viewpoints without surrendering to the primacy of any.

Aristotle,........

© hindustantimes