Is Omar Abdullah's resignation as Chief Minister “nirvana”  for Jammu and Kashmir? If so, the opponents demanding his head on the block must state whether they have a viable democratic alternative. Alongside, there is a call for dissolution of the Assembly. That makes things clearer as to what the opposition is angling for—President’s rule  and through that their own rule without any responsibility and accountability. It is as simple as that. However, a fundamental political question remains: why should Omar Abdullah oblige the opposition? Politically, logically, and constitutionally speaking, his party was voted into power for a five-year term.The electorate knew they were voting within the constraints of a Union Territory (UT). While they hoped he would be able to reclaim statehood, they were driven by an aggressive campaign set against the backdrop of the national leadership’s solemn promise. 

Voters saw a clear connection between the Centre’s pledge and the local political narrative. They envisioned a landscape where the Centre was ready to meet them more than halfway, while the local campaign sought to bring respectability to Delhi’s idea of reconciliation through restoration. They were lulled into the belief that the timing was perfect—which was, perhaps, the most beautiful part of the 2024 elections.  That moment's fragrance is in retreat.It  is equally true that the overwhelming mandate given to the National Conference (NC) came with heavy conditions. The public expected the NC to deliver on its manifesto promises—ranging from fighting for the restoration of Articles 370 and 35A, to reclaiming statehood and fulfilling good governance pledges like free electricity, 12 free cooking gas cylinders, enhanced ration scales, and employment.

Omar Abdullah's primary error was one........

© Greater Kashmir