Let Them Make Chop: The Fall of Nabanna and the Victory of Aspiration
Marie Antoinette might have never said, “Let them eat cake.”
History remembers the phrase anyway because it captured something people desperately wanted to believe: that those who ruled France had become incapable of understanding the ambitions, anxieties and frustrations of ordinary people.
Fallen regimes often acquire their own version of cake.
In Bengal, it was chop.
The controversy over chop shilpo was never about food. It was about aspiration. At a time when thousands of young Bengalis were preparing for competitive examinations, waiting for recruitment processes to conclude, leaving the state in search of opportunity and wondering whether merit still mattered, they did not need lessons in survival. They needed jobs. The remark became a symbol of something larger: a political establishment that increasingly appeared to believe the public should lower its expectations rather than demand higher performance.
The RG Kar tragedy produced another such moment. “Utsobe phirun” entered Bengal’s political vocabulary for much the same reason. Not because of the words themselves, but because of what many believed they revealed. A public demanding accountability felt it was being offered distraction. Both phrases help explain the election result.
The Bengal election was a revolt against entitlement.
The irony is that this revolt consumed a party built by one of the most self-made politicians India has produced. Nobody gifted Mamata Banerjee a dynasty. Nobody gifted her a constituency. Nobody gifted her a political inheritance. She fought her way into relevance and then into power. She built a movement around the idea that ordinary people from the trinamool—the grassroots—could challenge entrenched elites.
Yet over time, the word that increasingly followed Trinamool Congress was not reform but nepotism.
For years, Bengal watched politically connected careers accelerate while ordinary people stood in examination queues, interview queues and migration queues. The deepest wound was not merely political. It was demographic.
Bengal’s most ambitious young people increasingly began planning their futures elsewhere. Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, Gurgaon, Singapore, London and Dubai became familiar destinations in middle-class households. A state once known for attracting talent was now exporting it.
The anger surrounding Abhishek Banerjee is not simply about one politician. It became a debate about dynastic succession........
