“They will kill me like Morsi”. This is not merely a political statement. It is a sentence loaded with fear; fear of death, fear of deteriorating health, fear of helplessness, and perhaps, above all, fear of losing control over what happens to one’s own body. Imran Khan, according to his sister, has said that solitary confinement is aggravating his anxiety and blood pressure. He has then invoked the fate of Egypt’s former president Mohamed Morsi, who died in custody in 2019 after collapsing during a court hearing.

Whether Khan’s fear is medically justified, psychologically amplified, politically motivated, or some combination of all three cannot be determined by political argument. It requires evidence. And that is precisely why the statement deserves to be taken seriously; not necessarily believed as an allegation, and not dismissed as political theatre, but investigated. The health of a prisoner is ultimately a responsibility of the state. Political disagreement does not suspend that responsibility. Nor does imprisonment erase a person's right to appropriate medical care, human dignity, and reasonable protection from preventable harm.

The central question, therefore, is not simply whether Imran Khan is right when he says, “They will kill me like Morsi.” The more important question is: What should a responsible state do when a prisoner says he believes his health and life may be in danger?The answer should be neither political denial nor political outrage. It should be independent medical evidence. It is easy to imagine solitary confinement as simply a person being placed alone in a room. Psychologically, however, isolation is far more complicated.

Human beings are profoundly social creatures. Our sense of time, identity, security and emotional stability is continuously shaped by interaction with other people and the environment around us. Conversation, faces, movement, routine, natural light and ordinary human contact all provide cues through which the mind organizes reality.

When those cues are severely restricted for prolonged periods, the psychological consequences can become significant. Time may begin to feel distorted. Sleep can deteriorate. Concentration may weaken. Minor physical sensations can acquire enormous significance. Thoughts may become repetitive. Anxiety can intensify. A person may become increasingly preoccupied with health, danger and the future.

This does not mean that every person subjected to isolation will develop a psychiatric disorder. Nor does it mean that every symptom experienced in isolation is caused by confinement. But prolonged and harsh isolation is a recognized psychological stressor, and research has associated it with anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, impaired concentration, emotional distress and other adverse psychological outcomes. That distinction matters. We should neither exaggerate the medical consequences of solitary confinement nor trivialize them. The most important mistake in discussions of anxiety and blood pressure is to treat the mind and body as separate systems. They are not.

Fear and prolonged stress can activate the body's stress response. Heart rate can increase. Blood vessels can constrict. Blood pressure can rise temporarily. If stress is persistent or repeatedly triggered, the physiological effects can become part of a self-reinforcing cycle. Isolation can produce anxiety. Anxiety can produce physical sensations. Those sensations can create fear of illness. That fear can intensify anxiety. And the cycle continues. This does not mean that every rise in blood pressure is caused by anxiety. Hypertension has many causes, and only clinical evaluation can establish what is happening in a particular individual.

But if a prisoner is reporting persistent anxiety alongside repeated elevations in blood pressure, it is medically irresponsible to dismiss the combination simply as political rhetoric. It is equally irresponsible to declare that the combination proves an imminent threat to life. Both conclusions require evidence. Hypertension is not dangerous merely because the word sounds alarming. Its significance depends on the actual readings, how persistently they remain elevated, the individual's medical history, medications, and whether there are signs of acute organ........

© The Friday Times