1 Trending: Dear Women: Your Bad Life Choices At Cornell Frat Parties Shouldn’t Be National News

2 Trending: California Protects Itself From Accountability, Then Brags About It

3 Trending: Exclusive: Texas Dem Talarico Caught In Lie On Trans Insanity

4 Trending: Pope Leo’s Embrace Of Disabled People In France Is A Rebuke To Secular Europe

SCOTUS Asked To Stop Blue States From Shielding Abortion Drug Dealers

A separate lawsuit names 30 individuals and organizations leading ‘a sweeping, coordinated scheme’ to mail abortion drugs to pro-life states.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

There are many facets to the mail-order abortion fight, but the next battle comes in the form of a filing from the attorneys general of three pro-life states who are asking the Supreme Court to restore the constitutional equality disrupted by at least three blue states’ “shield laws.”

Democrat states California, Massachusetts, and New York have all enacted abortion-for-all policies designed to prevent punishment for doctors who illegally prescribe abortion drugs to people in pro-life states where they are banned.

In their motion filed on Sept. 30, Republican Attorney General Liz Murrill of Louisiana, Tim Griffin of Arkansas, and Steve Marshall of Alabama warned that these shield laws “have nothing to do with ensuring the availability of abortion within the borders of New York, Massachusetts, and California — they exist only to perpetuate abortions outside of those borders.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration claims its hands are tied until it concludes its mifepristone review, even though no review is required for the regulatory agency to reinstate some of the common-sense abortion pill safeguards, including an in-person doctor visit, that were stripped at President Joe Biden’s behest. Congress also previously failed to act to curb mail-order mifepristone, even after Murrill and several other attorneys general asked legislators to address shield laws. As a result, the GOP legal officers want the high bench to examine their case in light of the “full faith and credit and the equal-sovereignty doctrine.”

Murrill, who is leading a separate federal lawsuit again the FDA over its mail-order mifepristone scheme, told The Federalist in February that shield laws and the governors using them to block extraditions “are essentially facilitating criminal conduct in our state and they are nullifying our laws in our state simply because they disagree with our policy.”

New York and California specifically have refused Louisiana’s efforts to extradite and hold........

© The Federalist