menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Opinion: Don't trust Ottawa on Musqueam agreement

10 0
04.03.2026

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Opinion: Don't trust Ottawa on Musqueam agreement

British Columbians are not wrong to worry about the costs involved or the value of their private property

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Last weekend it became known that the Federal Government had signed an aboriginal rights agreement with the Musqueam First Nation, which acknowledged rights and title “within” a large area encompassing most of Metro Vancouver. This bilateral agreement between the Carney government and the Musqueam sets out their shared intention to “negotiate” Aboriginal title for the Musqueam within their vast claimed territory using the principles of UNDRIP as their lodestar.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

The last time we saw the federal government do this was on Haida Gwaii where, with the full support and participation of the David Eby government in B.C., they declared and went to court to solidify Aboriginal title for the Haida over their entire asserted terrestrial territory: that’s no less than a million hectares of land encompassing the whole of Haida Gwaii, an archipelago off the west coast.

Opinion: Don't trust Ottawa on Musqueam agreement Back to video

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

That declaration of Aboriginal title to 100 per cent of a claimed traditional territory is something that never would have occurred had the Haida proceeded with their Aboriginal title court case. In the landmark Tsilhqotʼin Nation v British Columbia case, for example, the Supreme Court granted Aboriginal title to less than five per cent of the band’s traditional territory in central B.C.

British Columbians can therefore be forgiven for getting very upset by this vaguely worded commitment by Canada to “negotiate” Aboriginal title for the Musqueam — and not even in a proper treaty context. At numerous points, the agreement makes reference to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) as a basis for implementation, going so far as to say on page 11 that “It is the intention of the Parties that this Agreement contribute the implementation of the UN Declaration” and, on page 14, that “For greater clarity, the Parties recognize and agree that the rights and principles affirmed in the UN Declaration are described as constituting the minimum standards for the survival, dignity and well-being of Indigenous peoples, including Musqueam.”

This last point carries more significance than perhaps it seems. Among the 46 articles of UNDRIP, certain ones are more impactful and worrisome than others. Article 26, for example, states that, “Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use.” That is to say, if an Indigenous group claims a territory, they own it and all its resources. Put the recently revealed Musqueam agreement together with Article 26 and you can quickly find yourself in a situation where the Musqueam could be at minimum compensated for the value of all properties in the Lower Mainland: approximately $1.9 trillion dollars.

Geoff Russ: Will Ottawa recognize Aboriginal 'title' over all of Vancouver?

Jamie Sarkonak: This is what reconciliation looks like — the end of property rights

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

The reaction in B.C. given the sensitivity of land rights and potential impact to property owners has been swift and passionate. British Columbians are quite clearly not prepared to simply trust that their most important asset — their house — will “probably” be fine if they leave this up to the wisdom and negotiating skills of the Carney government. Wade Grant, MP for Vancouver Quadra and member of the Musqueam Nation put out a release which was at pains to make clear the agreement does “not infringe on private property rights and will not alter ownership of privately held land.” That is almost certainly technically true. However, it conveniently ignores the fact that while homeowners will not be tossed out of their homes, the door is being opened — under the principles of UNDRIP — to financial compensation that is simply unfeasible. No government has $1.9 trillion dollars to spend because an aspirational UN human rights document thinks it ought to.

After McDonald's CEO mocked for taking tiny bite of new burger, A&W, Burger King, Wendy's respond Canada

After McDonald's CEO mocked for taking tiny bite of new burger, A&W, Burger King, Wendy's respond

Why Mark Carney got chippy with a reporter over what an 'unnamed government official' said News

Why Mark Carney got chippy with a reporter over what an 'unnamed government official' said

Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Canadian passport fees will go up on March 31 Canada

Canadian passport fees will go up on March 31

FIRST READING: Canada one of the world's last holdouts on medically transing children NP Comment

FIRST READING: Canada one of the world's last holdouts on medically transing children

Carney says U.S. strikes on Iran appear to be 'inconsistent with international law' Canadian Politics

Carney says U.S. strikes on Iran appear to be 'inconsistent with international law'

David Eby, while trying to avoid further blow back on this issue, first claimed he had not been briefed on the situation. However, within three hours of his initial denial, it came to light that Eby was, in fact, present at the signing ceremony between the Musqueam and Ottawa, which took place in his riding, though he was apparently still in the dark as to the agreement’s contents. We are therefore to believe that the premier had no inkling about an agreement that potentially throws land title in all of the Lower Mainland into question and creates massive business and investment uncertainty.

There remains much to be seen about the exact implementation of the Musqueam-Ottawa agreement. What is now clearer than ever is the secretive way both the provincial and federal governments are now going about the process of so-called “reconciliation” in British Columbia.

The real tragedy is that by continually misleading the public and allowing the spectre of the destruction of the value of private property to hang in the air, David Eby and his government, as well as the Carney government, are forging a path towards distrust and acrimony between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians.

Adam Pankratz is a lecturer at the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business and sits on the board of B.C.’s Public Land Use Society. 

Geoffrey S. Moyse, KC, is a retired senior lawyer who served as legal counsel on Indigenous law to the Province of BC, advising six successive governments on Aboriginal law over more than 30 years. He is principal at Moyse Law and an advisor to the Public Land Use Society.

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

These are the 3 best beauty products we tried this week Beauty Buzz: The best beauty products we tried this week. 3 hours ago Fashion & Beauty

These are the 3 best beauty products we tried this week

Beauty Buzz: The best beauty products we tried this week.

We reviewed 2026's most ambitious gaming laptop yet — here's our honest take The ASUS ROG Flow Z13-KJP is a love letter to Kojima fans 5 hours ago Tech

We reviewed 2026's most ambitious gaming laptop yet — here's our honest take

The ASUS ROG Flow Z13-KJP is a love letter to Kojima fans

The best Canadian women-owned brands to shop right now Celebrate on International Women's Day and beyond 6 hours ago Buy Canadian

The best Canadian women-owned brands to shop right now

Celebrate on International Women's Day and beyond

Advertisement 3Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Six Canadian made hand creams to salve your winter skincare problems Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. 1 day ago Life

Six Canadian made hand creams to salve your winter skincare problems

Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.

How to perfectly clean a shower: Simple tips and tricks Cleaning tips to help keep your shower spotless 1 day ago Home Living

How to perfectly clean a shower: Simple tips and tricks

Cleaning tips to help keep your shower spotless


© National Post