menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Indonesia’s Growth Illusion – OpEd

9 0
31.10.2026

Indonesia’s first-half 2026 growth of 5.61 percent, over Rp1,010 trillion in investment (Rp507 trillion FDI) and controlled inflation still fall short of the structural changes needed for 8 percent growth.

Expansion is driven mainly by government spending rather than private investment or productivity; programs such as free school meals and rural cooperatives add limited long-term value without better education, infrastructure and technology linkages.

Sustained progress requires shifting from consumption- and spending-led growth to productivity-driven development through quality education, R&D, industrial modernization and a better investment climate.

In 2026, Indonesia’s economy is expected to grow above 5%, to invest massively and to keep inflation within the Bank of Indonesia’s target corridor. The data therefore looks encouraging in the first half of this year. However, these strong numbers also highlight the economic problems Indonesia is dealing with today. There is a large difference between economic growth and development, and the government’s growth ambition of 8% cannot be reached by relying on public expenditure and state-controlled corporations alone.

From a quantitative standpoint, Indonesia’s economy has been growing, with 5.61% GDP growth in the first quarter of 2026. In terms of investment, there were some impressive numbers, such as more than Rp1,010 trillion in investment realization in the first half of the year and even more impressive numbers for foreign direct investment (FDI), totalling more than Rp507 trillion, which led to over 1.4 million jobs. Moreover, the country’s inflation has remained within Bank Indonesia’s target. However, mere stability and growth are not enough for transformation.

Growing at more than 5% does not automatically generate productivity and competitiveness. The key to growth is using labour, capital, technology, and natural resources more efficiently. In other words, stimulating consumption is not the same as stimulating productive........

© Eurasia Review