The Democrats’ Luciferian Beauty Play
The Democrats’ Luciferian Beauty Play
What’s for certain is that the Luciferian Beauty Principle combined with the idiot vote is a toxic mix. It can deliver an absolutely beautiful package—hiding a demonic inner ugliness that’s deadly to a republic;
Selwyn Duke ——Bio and Archives--May 27, 2026
Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Pundit Bill O’Reilly recently said he was “surprised” that ex-NY governor Andrew Cuomo lost to Zohran Mamdani in the 2025 NYC mayoral race.
“I thought,” he told Cuomo during a May 14 discussion, “you were going to wax them [your competitors].”
Do you know when I realized Mamdani would win?
The very first time I saw him on TV.
Luciferian Beauty Principle
No, it wasn’t that Mamdani was promising to rob Peter blind to pay Paul and then send both home to rent-frozen apartments on a free bus. It was that I understand the Luciferian Beauty Principle.
Now, you can take the following as metaphor if you’re not a theist. In Christian theology, Lucifer chose pride over God, rebelled and became the purest manifestation of evil: Satan. But he also was something else: As Lucifer, whose name means “light bringer,” he was known as the most beautiful of angels.
There is an all-important lesson there. It’s not just that evil doesn’t appear comic-book style, with a pitchfork and horns; it masquerades as something beautiful and impressive. Rather, it’s also that the malevolent know how easily humans are seduced by what pleases the eye and ear. We see this, for example, whenever a man is deceived by a comely gold-digger.
As for Mamdani the power--and national grave--digger, he’s a good-looking young guy with an easy smile, charisma on command and the most silvery of tongues, eloquent and articulate to the hilt. Note here the studies showing that it doesn’t matter what you say; if you say it well, you will sway people. It’s a testimonial to the power of style over substance.
Mamdani isn’t alone, either.
In fact, it appears that the hard-left (e.g., socialists) have possibly been purposely, actively........
