menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

I Walked Into Auschwitz With Knowledge. I Left With Something Else

47 0
24.04.2026

The Middle East debates history loudly. Auschwitz speaks in silence.

Last week, I stood inside that silence.

Like many Muslims, I grew up aware of the Holocaust—but at a distance. I knew the number: six million. I knew the name: Auschwitz. I understood it as one of history’s greatest crimes.

But awareness is not the same as understanding.

I traveled to Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II-Birkenau as part of a delegation organized by SHARAKA, an initiative born from the spirit of the Abraham Accords to foster dialogue across communities that have long remained apart. We were Muslims from across the world—Morocco, Pakistan, Tunisia, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Syria, Somaliland, the United States, the UAE, and Bahrain.

We did not arrive as tourists.

We arrived as witnesses-in-training.

At Auschwitz I, I passed beneath the infamous gate: *Arbeit Macht Frei*. The phrase is familiar, almost overexposed in textbooks and documentaries. But standing beneath it, its meaning feels less like history and more like a warning.

Inside, there is no spectacle. No dramatic narration. Only evidence.

Shoes. Suitcases. Hair.

Each item once belonged to someone who had a name, a family, a future. What struck me was not only the scale of loss, but the methodical stripping of identity before life itself was taken.

I expected to feel something immediate—grief, anger, even shock.

Instead, I felt restraint.

Auschwitz does not overwhelm you at first. It allows you to walk, to observe, to think you understand. And then, slowly, it unsettles you.

That unsettling deepened at Birkenau.

The space opens up. The sky stretches wider. The tracks run forward into what once functioned with horrifying efficiency. There is more air, more distance—and somehow, more weight.

It is there that the number begins to collapse.

Six million no longer feels like a figure. It becomes a question.

And more uncomfortably:

How did so many of us—far from Europe, across generations—come to understand it so little?

As a Muslim, I carried that question with me.

Not as an accusation, but as a realization.

In much of the Muslim world, the Holocaust is acknowledged, but not deeply internalized. It exists in textbooks and passing references, sometimes filtered through political narratives, but rarely encountered as a human reality of this magnitude.

Standing in Auschwitz removes that distance.

It replaces abstraction with presence.

That transformation became undeniable during the March of the Living.

Walking from Auschwitz to Birkenau alongside thousands—many Jewish, others from different backgrounds—there were no debates, no arguments, no competing narratives.

And a quiet sense of responsibility.

Our delegation walked together—Muslims from countries often divided by politics and history. Yet in that moment, those divisions felt irrelevant.

We were not representing nations.

We were confronting the consequences of human failure.

In Kraków’s Jewish quarter, the silence took on another form. Here, absence is layered over what was once life—communities, culture, continuity.

The Holocaust did not only take lives.

I do not claim to fully understand what I witnessed.

But I now understand the importance of refusing distance.

Initiatives like SHARAKA matter because they create encounters that challenge inherited gaps in understanding. They do not ask participants to abandon their identities or perspectives.

They ask something more fundamental:

None of this resolves the complexities of the present. The Middle East remains shaped by conflict, competing narratives, and unresolved history. As a Muslim, my perspectives are still informed by those realities.

But Auschwitz does something to those perspectives.

It does not erase them.

It reminds us that suffering on this scale demands recognition beyond politics, beyond affiliation, beyond comfort.

I did not leave Auschwitz with answers.

Clarity that distance enables misunderstanding.

Clarity that silence can become indifference.

Clarity that witnessing—even once—creates responsibility.

I did not go to Auschwitz to form a political position.

I went, perhaps unknowingly, to confront a gap in understanding.

What I found was not guilt.

There are places in the world that do not ask for your opinion.

They ask for your humility.

Auschwitz is one of them.


© The Times of Israel (Blogs)