Looking to the future, India must follow its own path to becoming a developed economy rather than fast-track development through a China-plus strategy, according to top former Indian diplomats at a media event last week. This refers to foreign investors seeking to decouple or de-risk their production and supply chain activities by adding an alternative manufacturing or sourcing location to China due to US-China geopolitical tensions. The US in particular is aggressively pushing such a strategy with allies like India, which stands to benefit from diversifying supply chains. But the fundamental fact remains that its economic future cannot be subject to somebody liking China, which can swiftly change, argued former national security advisor, Shivshankar Menon.

The difficulty is that this strategy is also not playing out according to the script. For all the talk of de-risking, the world’s dependence on China remains intact. The dragon accounts for 40% of global growth, while its trade with the US and European Union is booming. When Western nations talk of China-plus, they are only looking at additionality. India’s bilateral trade and dependence on China, too, is growing despite efforts to minimise it due to the ongoing border stand-off since April 2020. India’s imports are close to $98 billion. Of this, 28 categories account for $90 billion. Within that, electrical equipment and power equipment account for 50%. While there has been some progress in getting Apple to shift part of its iPhone production and attract its preferred contract manufacturers like Foxconn and Pegatron, they are in no tearing hurry to reduce their dependence on the mainland.

Also Read

Asian power play: Sage observations for Delhi as it struggles for elusive strategic clarity in dealing with China

Nobody is really moving away from China except in an incremental sort of way, the speakers said, adding that due to rising domestic wages Chinese companies themselves are relocating to Vietnam and Mexico. For India to be an automatic destination for a China-plus one strategy, the policy imperative must be to ensure that it is equal or more attractive than Thailand, Bangladesh, Mexico and Vietnam. These countries are a part of trading arrangements where they have access to the US market and are members of the RCEP to become a part of global supply chains. India, for its part, has chosen to opt out of the latter mega regional trade grouping as it was totally against the country’s interests and gave undue advantage to China-made goods.

Also Read

Fifth column by Tavleen Singh: Surreal reality and reality

Across the aisle by P Chidambaram: The final assault on Constitution

Happiness in India: India’s economic growth over time does not show up in improved happiness score and ranking

The giant has arrived: India’s rise as a global power creates a tightrope of domestic and international aspects

India therefore cannot bank on a China-plus strategy to further its development. It is far more efficacious to rely on its intrinsic strengths of being currently the world’s fastest growing economy which has a huge domestic market to attract global MNCs. India’s attractiveness to potential investors is its access to a large labour supply with relatively cheap wages for skilled labour and a massive $1.4 trillion infrastructure development is underway to lower logistics costs. India’s manufacturing labour costs may be nearly half of Vietnam’s at $0.8 an hour, but investors prefer to relocate to the latter because of its manufacturing ecosystem and rapid improvements in logistics performance indices. If it maintains an open and unrestrictive trade policy and a higher level of ambition in inking agreements with mega regional groupings, it can fully leverage the benefits of globalisation by exporting more. In addition, it must follow a China-plus one strategy in its imports by finding alternative sources for the critical goods and equipment imported from the mainland, although that is admittedly difficult.

Looking to the future, India must follow its own path to becoming a developed economy rather than fast-track development through a China-plus strategy, according to top former Indian diplomats at a media event last week. This refers to foreign investors seeking to decouple or de-risk their production and supply chain activities by adding an alternative manufacturing or sourcing location to China due to US-China geopolitical tensions. The US in particular is aggressively pushing such a strategy with allies like India, which stands to benefit from diversifying supply chains. But the fundamental fact remains that its economic future cannot be subject to somebody liking China, which can swiftly change, argued former national security advisor, Shivshankar Menon.

The difficulty is that this strategy is also not playing out according to the script. For all the talk of de-risking, the world’s dependence on China remains intact. The dragon accounts for 40% of global growth, while its trade with the US and European Union is booming. When Western nations talk of China-plus, they are only looking at additionality. India’s bilateral trade and dependence on China, too, is growing despite efforts to minimise it due to the ongoing border stand-off since April 2020. India’s imports are close to $98 billion. Of this, 28 categories account for $90 billion. Within that, electrical equipment and power equipment account for 50%. While there has been some progress in getting Apple to shift part of its iPhone production and attract its preferred contract manufacturers like Foxconn and Pegatron, they are in no tearing hurry to reduce their dependence on the mainland.

Nobody is really moving away from China except in an incremental sort of way, the speakers said, adding that due to rising domestic wages Chinese companies themselves are relocating to Vietnam and Mexico. For India to be an automatic destination for a China-plus one strategy, the policy imperative must be to ensure that it is equal or more attractive than Thailand, Bangladesh, Mexico and Vietnam. These countries are a part of trading arrangements where they have access to the US market and are members of the RCEP to become a part of global supply chains. India, for its part, has chosen to opt out of the latter mega regional trade grouping as it was totally against the country’s interests and gave undue advantage to China-made goods.

India therefore cannot bank on a China-plus strategy to further its development. It is far more efficacious to rely on its intrinsic strengths of being currently the world’s fastest growing economy which has a huge domestic market to attract global MNCs. India’s attractiveness to potential investors is its access to a large labour supply with relatively cheap wages for skilled labour and a massive $1.4 trillion infrastructure development is underway to lower logistics costs. India’s manufacturing labour costs may be nearly half of Vietnam’s at $0.8 an hour, but investors prefer to relocate to the latter because of its manufacturing ecosystem and rapid improvements in logistics performance indices. If it maintains an open and unrestrictive trade policy and a higher level of ambition in inking agreements with mega regional groupings, it can fully leverage the benefits of globalisation by exporting more. In addition, it must follow a China-plus one strategy in its imports by finding alternative sources for the critical goods and equipment imported from the mainland, although that is admittedly difficult.

Get live Share Market updates, Stock Market Quotes, and the latest India News and business news on Financial Express. Download the Financial Express App for the latest finance news.

QOSHE - Shedding China-plus tag: India should follow an independent path towards development using its intrinsic strengths - The Financial Express
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Shedding China-plus tag: India should follow an independent path towards development using its intrinsic strengths

13 9
01.04.2024

Looking to the future, India must follow its own path to becoming a developed economy rather than fast-track development through a China-plus strategy, according to top former Indian diplomats at a media event last week. This refers to foreign investors seeking to decouple or de-risk their production and supply chain activities by adding an alternative manufacturing or sourcing location to China due to US-China geopolitical tensions. The US in particular is aggressively pushing such a strategy with allies like India, which stands to benefit from diversifying supply chains. But the fundamental fact remains that its economic future cannot be subject to somebody liking China, which can swiftly change, argued former national security advisor, Shivshankar Menon.

The difficulty is that this strategy is also not playing out according to the script. For all the talk of de-risking, the world’s dependence on China remains intact. The dragon accounts for 40% of global growth, while its trade with the US and European Union is booming. When Western nations talk of China-plus, they are only looking at additionality. India’s bilateral trade and dependence on China, too, is growing despite efforts to minimise it due to the ongoing border stand-off since April 2020. India’s imports are close to $98 billion. Of this, 28 categories account for $90 billion. Within that, electrical equipment and power equipment account for 50%. While there has been some progress in getting Apple to shift part of its iPhone production and attract its preferred contract manufacturers like Foxconn and Pegatron, they are in no tearing hurry to reduce their dependence on the mainland.

Also Read

Asian power play: Sage observations for Delhi as it struggles for elusive strategic clarity in dealing with China

Nobody is really moving away from China except in an incremental sort of way, the speakers said, adding that due to rising domestic wages Chinese companies themselves are........

© The Financial Express


Get it on Google Play