menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

KBJ’s Critical-Theory Defense Of Magic-Dirt Citizenship Erases Legitimacy Of Judicial Supremacy

10 0
06.07.2026

1 Trending: Outrage Over Texas Teaching The Bible Is Anti-Intellectual

2 Trending: Mamdani Is Telling A Brazen Lie About ‘Capitalist Mismanagement’ Of New York

3 Trending: SCOTUS Birthplace Citizenship Decision Is John Roberts’ Roe v. Wade

4 Trending: FCC Chair Vows To Crack Down On Anti-Conservative Media’s ‘Free Monopoly’

KBJ’s Critical-Theory Defense Of Magic-Dirt Citizenship Erases Legitimacy Of Judicial Supremacy

Our ‘theater-kid occupied government’ routinely attains to new heights of absurdity, as shown in Ketanji Brown Jackson’s antiracist screed.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The travesty of last week’s Trump v. Barbara decision on birthplace citizenship is further highlighted by the fact that the five-vote majority consisted of nominally conservative Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining with all three liberal justices.

While Roberts authored the majority opinion, social-justice warrior Ketanji Brown Jackson could not restrain herself from penning her own 20-page concurrence to specifically target the erudite dissent of Justice Clarence Thomas. Jackson provides no serious intellectual response to the scholarly treatise Thomas produced, yet it is illuminating for other reasons. Recall this is the same woman who, her prestigious position on the court notwithstanding, in December 2024 performed onstage in a Broadway musical all about feminist and LGBT “empowerment.”

Our “theater-kid occupied government,” to borrow the hypothesis popularized online by John Doyle, routinely attains to new heights of absurdity, as shown in Jackson’s antiracist screed. Jackson’s concurrence is packed with language that reeks of her pervasive critical-theory framework, which sees all of history as a struggle between “oppressors” and “oppressed.”

Upon reading through it, one is shocked by the ubiquitous presence of CRT buzzwords and phrases such as “antisubordination reset,” “universalist approach,” “universalist vision of belonging and citizenship,” “racial reckoning,” “anticaste........

© The Federalist