Over the last month, I have spoken at five events to business managers, university directors, and athletic department executives about “generational diversity.” Today, we not only experience ethnic and gender diversity in the workplace but also a diversity of generations attempting to work together. Many of today’s workplaces have four generations present, including Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials, and now Generation Z.

And with these two newer generations come new terms of engagement.

Recently, a department head spoke to me about the number of young team members who expected immediate freedom on the terms and times of their labor. She said, “Millennials and Gen Z employees often expect to set their own hours, establish their own boundaries, and even dictate the tasks they’ll take on.”

Another vice president told me he had three employees approach him, questioning him about their “career path.” This term describes the course each person will take to be promoted and receive pay raises, ultimately resulting in the arrival of an ideal position in the organization. The VP frowned and said, “I would have never brought that up to a supervisor when I was young. I would have felt I was being selfish, focusing on my own growth rather than the company’s.”

I had to agree with him. As my career began, I focused on executing my job with excellence, and I counted on my superiors to move me up.

Today, times have changed.

In our office at Growing Leaders, we find ourselves talking to young leaders about their potential career paths and the steps they can take toward promotion and greater leadership and influence. A third of our team is under 30 years old. It dawned on me that I had not taken the time to explain to our team how work works. By this, I mean there’s a natural order of laws that govern how freedom, influence, and even pay raises tend to operate. While there are exceptions to these rules, the following are four that I embrace that usually make sense in the marketplace.

In 2019, we had a growing number of team members who requested days each week to work from home. It’s obviously quite normal in our culture today. Over the last decade, we’ve allowed several team members to do this. But I’ve always based my decision on a simple principle: autonomy increases with productivity.

In other words, we all earn our right to work on our own terms. Those who demonstrate they are producers and need little or no supervision to meet and exceed expectations get to enjoy greater levels of freedom. Each director must evaluate the production of employees and make that judgment. Freedom isn’t free. It’s earned.

When team members inquire about promotions and pay raises, I’m not put off by that conversation, but we always try to clarify that testing always precedes promotion. By this, we mean that tenure alone doesn’t earn the right to be promoted or to receive bonuses. Academic degrees alone don’t automatically translate into pay raises either.

Just like a product in a store is never used until it is tested, so it is with team members. The deeper the testing and the more team members display they can pass those tests with flying colors, the more likely they’ll be invited into greater levels of responsibility and rewarded with greater remuneration. Simply doing a job doesn’t equal progress. Promotion follows performance at a higher level.

Sometimes, it’s hard for a young, inexperienced team member to see a supervisor experiencing high levels of independence and authority. Similar to “autonomy increases with productivity,” this second cousin clarifies that the more results a person produces in their work, the fewer rules are needed to legislate their activity on the job.

Working under Dr. John C. Maxwell for 20 years, I learned this rule quickly. John was loud and clear about the fact that results were his “love language.” My work ethic and my reaching outcomes were all he needed to allow me great independence, even in my twenties. He never asked me to clock in; he only asked me to put out. I was happy to do so. This is how work usually works.

This one occurs naturally, but few people notice it. Our influence (and ultimately our leadership role) rises when we provide a rare resource. Consider a simple example: If you’re with a group of people in a car, traveling in an unfamiliar city, and only one person has a GPS—he or she is the one with the most influence. Similarly, if I bring a skill, a talent, or an ability that is scarce to my team, I tend to gain more influence.

It’s just how the marketplace works: supply and demand. If what you have is in short supply and great demand, you’re in good shape. In fact, the more scarce your ability is, the more remuneration and influence should come your way.

One quick disclaimer: I don’t mean to sound utilitarian. I love each of our team members and enjoy working with them, regardless of their roles. But freedom and advancement are privileges we all earn through our service.

QOSHE - How Work Works: 4 Rules That Govern the Workplace - Tim Elmore
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

How Work Works: 4 Rules That Govern the Workplace

20 0
08.03.2024

Over the last month, I have spoken at five events to business managers, university directors, and athletic department executives about “generational diversity.” Today, we not only experience ethnic and gender diversity in the workplace but also a diversity of generations attempting to work together. Many of today’s workplaces have four generations present, including Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials, and now Generation Z.

And with these two newer generations come new terms of engagement.

Recently, a department head spoke to me about the number of young team members who expected immediate freedom on the terms and times of their labor. She said, “Millennials and Gen Z employees often expect to set their own hours, establish their own boundaries, and even dictate the tasks they’ll take on.”

Another vice president told me he had three employees approach him, questioning him about their “career path.” This term describes the course each person will take to be promoted and receive pay raises, ultimately resulting in the arrival of an ideal position in the organization. The VP frowned and said, “I would have never brought that up to a supervisor when I was young. I would have felt I was being selfish, focusing........

© Psychology Today


Get it on Google Play