That was the budget which became infamous for prescribing higher spending and tighter controls when the exact opposite was needed

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

First Reading is a daily newsletter keeping you posted on the travails of Canadian politicos, all curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.

The 2024 federal budget dropped just two hours before this newsletter got sent out. So below is a frantic summary. A much more professional rundown is available via the National Post.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

First, the main bullet points: Higher deficits, higher spending and higher capital gains taxes. The National Post tallied up $480 billion in program spending with a $40 billion deficit.

Most of the budget’s main points were leaked ahead of time, such as $2.4 billion for “artificial intelligence” and Friday’s surprise pledge to fix housing by 2031. It’s based on these early details that former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge hazarded a guess on Monday night that the 2024 budget was “likely to be the worst budget since the MacEachen budget of 1982.” That particular budget – tabled by finance minister Allan MacEachen in the waning days of the Pierre Trudeau government – became infamous for bringing in a restrictive package of higher taxes and price controls at a time when the economy was already plummeting into recession. As Dodge told CTV, Canada needs increased productivity and lower inflation, both of which you generally get by reducing spending, regulation and taxes. “We’re going in exactly the wrong direction,” he said.

Being old enough to actually remember the 1982 budget debacle and having a lot of respect for David Dodge, this is a truly scary 2024 budget prediction. https://t.co/CSBl5XLVyE

Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

An increase in the capital gains tax was probably the most significant budget measure that wasn’t leaked ahead of time. Currently, half of all capital gains (money made from selling assets) are tax exempt, while the new budget would drop this to one third. The Liberals pitched this as a “rich people paying their fair share” measure that will bring in about $20 billion in extra revenue over the next five years. The usual critique against capital gains taxes, however, is that they’re a “tax on a tax,” since any asset being sold would have presumably been purchased with income that had already been subject to income taxes (and, like most tax increases, it risks scaring away investment to places with lower taxes).

Budgets are released to the media in what’s known as a “lock-up.” Journalists are given early access to the budget from a special room in which they’re sealed off from any access to the outside world. That way, they can write news stories that get published at the exact same time that the budget is released. Anyways, during this lockup reporters for the Canadian Press found time to count how many times the word “fairness” is mentioned in the budget. It’s mentioned 50 times.

The immediate reaction of NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh to the federal budget was that it would continue “Conservative handouts.” “Justin Trudeau will keep Pierre Poilievre’s $60 billion in taxpayer handouts to corporations,” he wrote on X. It’s not immediately clear what Singh is referencing, given that Poilievre hasn’t been in government since 2015. But it’s likely a reference to Harper-era corporate tax cuts which have indeed been maintained by the Liberals. But the $60 billion figure is way off; that was the estimate for the total tax relief afforded by the cuts over the first seven years of Harper’s government.

#BREAKING

The Conservative handouts will continue.

Justin Trudeau will keep Pierre Poilievre's $60 billion in taxpayer handouts to corporations.

Thanks to Pierre and Justin, it's a good day for Greedy Galen Weston and a bad day for you.

If there’s one very important rule about being Governor General of Canada, it’s that you’re not allowed to show any partisan sympathies whatsoever. The foundational rule of constitutional monarchy is that the King (and his representatives) nominally maintain full political control, provided that they never do or say anything partisan and act solely on the advice of the electorate. There’s been wars fought over this and everything. So it’s extremely unusual to see a governor general seeming to endorse a piece of proposed House of Commons legislation – particularly when it’s a highly controversial piece of legislation that would prescribe unprecedented checks on free speech. Over the weekend, Governor General Mary Simon held a symposium at Rideau Hall to discus the crisis of “online hate” and propose “solutions for a safer digital world.” The language is all very similar to government justifications for Bill C-63, the Liberals’ proposed “Online Harms Bill” that, among other things, would prescribe life sentences for hate speech and enable preventative detention of Canadians suspected of future hate speech offences. In fact, the justice minister who tabled Bill C-63, Arif Virani, was even an attendee at the symposium – as were a number of activists who have been vocal about increased curbs on free speech.

Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett was recently in Canada to deliver a keynote speech at the Canada Strong and Free Networking Conference. Although Bennett is a conservative, thanks to the extremely confusing machinations of Israeli politics, his brief tenure as the country’s leader actually saw him at the head of a coalition that included Arab representation and far-left elements. Before returning home, Bennett gave an interview to Global News where he naturally expressed displeasure with Canada’s recent moves to subject Israel to military embargoes. “We expect friends to be with us not when it’s easy, but when it’s tough,” he said.

For most of Canadian history, it was a given that non-Canadians would struggle to name our prime minister. But Justin Trudeau’s international notoriety has become so widespread that foreigners are even starting to note the name of our opposition leader. A recent article in the Australian version of The Spectator profiled Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, framing his as a model on how to oppose so-called “woke” politics. “He (Poilievre) takes the fight to politicians on the left; he doesn’t take advice from 30-year-old, risk-averse, careerist advisers who … seem not to believe in anything,” it wrote as a dig at Australia’s own centre-right movement.

Get all of these insights and more into your inbox by signing up for the First Reading newsletter here.

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Plus a few of their favourite things

The Vancouver company has revealed its collection of gear for the Canadian athletes headed to the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Paris this summer

Protein bars, vitamin chocolate, salty treats and more

Casper, Best Buy and Sephora, to name a few

Nicki Minaj, Ice Cube and Avril Lavigne are on sale now

365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4

© 2024 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.

This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

You can manage saved articles in your account.

and save up to 100 articles!

You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.

QOSHE - FIRST READING: The worst federal budget since 1982? - Tristin Hopper
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

FIRST READING: The worst federal budget since 1982?

13 0
17.04.2024

That was the budget which became infamous for prescribing higher spending and tighter controls when the exact opposite was needed

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

First Reading is a daily newsletter keeping you posted on the travails of Canadian politicos, all curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.

The 2024 federal budget dropped just two hours before this newsletter got sent out. So below is a frantic summary. A much more professional rundown is available via the National Post.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

First, the main bullet points: Higher deficits, higher spending and higher capital gains taxes. The National Post tallied up $480 billion in program spending with a $40 billion deficit.

Most of the budget’s main points were leaked ahead of time, such as $2.4 billion for “artificial intelligence” and Friday’s surprise pledge to fix housing by 2031. It’s based on these early details that former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge hazarded a guess on Monday night that the 2024 budget was “likely to be the worst budget since the MacEachen budget of 1982.” That particular budget – tabled by finance minister Allan MacEachen in the waning days of the Pierre Trudeau government – became infamous for bringing in a restrictive package of higher taxes and price controls at a time when the economy was already plummeting into recession. As Dodge told CTV, Canada needs increased productivity and lower inflation, both of which you generally get by reducing spending, regulation and taxes. “We’re going in exactly the wrong direction,” he said.

Being old enough to actually remember the 1982 budget debacle and having a lot of respect for David Dodge, this is a truly scary 2024 budget prediction. https://t.co/CSBl5XLVyE

Get a dash of perspective along........

© National Post


Get it on Google Play