menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Terry Glavin: The muddled and murky world of Michael Ma

57 0
03.04.2026

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Terry Glavin: The muddled and murky world of Michael Ma

The Liberal MP has repeatedly associated with groups affiliated with or linked to China's United Front

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

You might have thought that the floor-crossing Liberal MP Michael Ma would have been political kryptonite after his March 26 performance at a parliamentary committee looking into the implications of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s January invitation to China to annually export 49,000 electrical vehicles into Canada.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

Ma had badgered the expert witness Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, impugned the credibility of the China Strategic Risk Institute where she serves as a senior advisor, demanded to know whether she had personally witnessed acts of forced labour in China and appeared to suggest that Beijing’s persecution of the Uyghur minority in Xinjiang was merely “hearsay.”

Terry Glavin: The muddled and murky world of Michael Ma Back to video

After days of dodging direct questions about his own views on the subject, Carney eventually responded by saying Ma had apologized, but Carney himself would only go so far as to claim that his government “takes issues of forced labor and child labour incredibly seriously,” and as for Xinjiang, “there are parts of China that are higher risk.”

This newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

Ma’s apology consisted of a statement of regret that he “inadvertently came across as dismissive” about forced-labour practices and that in his exchange with McCuaig-Johnston, Xinjiang had gotten mixed up with the coastal manufacturing hub of Shenzhen.

Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson tried to smooth everything over by asserting that it was all simply a matter of Carney having promised Chinese supreme leader Xi Jinping that public criticism was a red line he wouldn’t cross. “We don’t need to have public discussions about where we disagree,” Hodgson said. “We make that clear to our friends in China.”

But what this commitment also means is that Carney, his cabinet and his caucus shouldn’t be expected to come clean with Canadians about the Liberal party’s ongoing collusions with Beijing’s big-money operatives in Canada, either.

With the multifaceted “strategic partnership” Carney entered into with China in January, those intimacies are already becoming more deeply entrenched, even after several years of........

© National Post