The message to municipal leaders is that they’re subservient, not independent. Every action — even their election by Albertans — will be open to reversal
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Alberta politics suddenly has more lanes than a bowling alley.
Stay out of our lane, Premier Danielle Smith says to Ottawa.
Now, she sends the same message to Alberta municipalities — beware of “creeping” into the province’s lane.
The munis say wait just a minute, the province is doing the creeping, straight into the local lane.
This is all about Ottawa and the UCP’s sovereignty agenda. The premier is very clear about that in her prickly legalistic way.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Don't have an account? Create Account
She is ensuring that municipalities and their councils don’t become centres of opposition, compliant to Ottawa in the hunt for funding, and hence disloyal to the UCP and its goals.
“We want to make sure that municipalities are not creeping into provincial jurisdiction, and that they’re also not enacting policy and then are upset with the kind of policies that we’re trying to implement at the provincial level,” Smith said at a news conference.
“What we’ve observed is that the federal government is attempting to do a variety of workarounds to get their agenda passed, which may be in conflict to what it is that we want to do as a province.”
She’s referring to direct bilateral deals between municipal governments and Ottawa, which she will ban for just about every public authority in the province, from elected councils to school systems, universities and health care.
She continued: “There is also a need as well, I think, to give some clarity around the fact that we intend to defend our jurisdiction from a provincial point of view.”
Smith seems to be saying the UCP needs defending from its own local governments.
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
“And so we are taking every mechanism that we need to make sure that we’re asserting that the federal government has to talk with us when it comes to supporting municipalities.
“The Constitution doesn’t have a specific mandate for municipalities other than to say that they’re the responsibility of the province.”
Smith says the Bill 20 powers mostly exist now, at least in theory. They would only be used in “extreme” cases.
But the message to municipal leaders is that they’re subservient, not independent. Every action — even their election by Albertans — will be open to reversal.
Alberta governments are usually very careful not to offend the broad range of local leaders. These people have influence in their communities and can be very helpful in provincial election campaigns.
But local politicians also believe their first duty is to the people who elect them, not the provincial rulers.
Smith has pretty much shattered that illusion.
AB Munis, which represents 265 municipalities of all sizes covering 85 per cent of Alberta, responded with unprecedented fury.
“Alberta municipalities is concerned the bill will intimidate and even silence legally elected officials who dare to criticize the provincial government,” president Tyler Gandam told a news conference.
He said Bill 20 would “fundamentally redraw the blueprint of our local democracy” and set a dangerous precedent for future provincial governments.
Gandam, also the mayor of Wetaskiwin, added that the UCP’s move is nothing less than “an attempt by the provincial government to grab more power and wield more control over how people live in their communities.”
These local bodies are often respectfully critical of specific provincial politics. Until now, not one of them has ever claimed the province is stifling their independence and threatening local democracy.
Smith is taking a big risk here. Why? The answer can only be that the UCP will brook no local dissent when the real crisis with Ottawa comes.
There’s a common view that Smith’s sovereignty zeal will fade away when the federal Conservatives are elected.
Don’t count on that. These deep structural limits to local independence may seem anti-Trudeau now, but they’ll be anti-federal in any era.
Don Braid’s column appears regularly in the Herald
X: @DonBraid
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
Make eating at home easy and simple
Find out what’s in, what’s out and what’s next
Not a knick-knack in sight
Fashion brand Badgley Mischka has been worn by Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, Helen Mirren and many more.
Plus his can't-live-without travel essentials
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2024 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
You can manage saved articles in your account.
and save up to 100 articles!
You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Tarik Cyril Amar
Rami G Khouri
Dr Ramzy Baroud
Mort Laitner
Bradley Blankenship
visit website
