How I Got Mark Cuban to Answer My Email in 7 Minutes Flat

Why Investors Are Hungry For Cybersecurity IPOs

In Another Economic Bright Spot, the Fed's Preferred Inflation Gauge Cools in December

Emma Grede's Favorite Books Include Titles by Peter Thiel, Melinda Gates, Brené Brown, and Eric Schmidt

VC Funding in 2024: High-Profile Departures, Layoffs and a Glut of Investors Struggling to Generate Returns

This Founder Is on a Mission to Make Information More Accessible for the Hard-of-Sight Community

Does the Election Calculus of Reid Hoffman and Bill Ackman Add Up?

This piece has been updated with a statement from Apple.

Daniel Ek, founder and CEO of music streaming service Spotify took to LinkedIn on Friday to complain long and loud about Apple's new policies for its app store in Europe. Ek may have a point that what Apple's doing is questionable, if not actually illegal. But he is absolutely the wrong person to make that point.

Spotify has been publicly lambasted by musicians ranging from the late David Crosby to Radiohead's Thom Yorke, who say the company makes it nearly impossible for musicians who aren't superstars to make a living at their craft. So when Ek turned around and made almost the same complaint about Apple's treatment of app developers, the messenger's reputation may have drowned out the message. It's a lesson every business leader or entrepreneur should consider before sharing an opinion in a public forum.

Apple has long taken a firm stand against "sideloading"--allowing users to install apps on their iPhones and iPads without going through the Apple App Store. Apple's prohibition on sideloading has come under scrutiny, both in the U.S. and the European Union on antitrust grounds. Recently, the EU passed the Digital Markets Act (DMA). When full enforcement begins on March 1, Apple will be required to allow both sideloading and non-Apple payments on its devices.

In view of the new law, Apple rolled "new business terms" for developers who want to take advantage of their newfound right to have their apps installed and/or receive payment without going through Apple's app store in the European market. Developers can adopt the new terms, allowing their apps to be sideloaded, or else stick with existing terms and restrict themselves to Apple's app store the company explained.

But, Ek argued, the choice Apple is offering isn't really a choice at all. At first glance, the new terms might sound pretty good. Commissions are reduced from 30 percent to 17 percent, or 10 percent after the first year. Payments processed outside Apple's app store would incur no additional fee. But then there's this: "iOS apps distributed from the App Store and/or an alternative app marketplace will pay €0.50 [about 54 cents] for each first annual install per year over a 1 million threshold."

That last fee could be the deciding factor for many developers, as many have pointed out. Keep in mind that any popular app will get updated at least once a year, which means developers with more than a million installs will have to pay that fee per user per year in perpetuity. It also means that small developers who choose the new terms could be putting themselves at financial risk, especially if their app is free to download. Imagine a couple of young app entrepreneur working away in a garage who think they have a winning concept and decide to release it to see if people like it. Let's say their app goes viral in Europe, and 10 million iPhone users there download it. If they've chosen the new terms, those developers now owe Apple 4.5 million euros.

As Ek says, this calculation may well scare most developers out of choosing the new business terms, thus rendering Europe's new law irrelevant because virtually everyone will opt out of it. "While Apple has behaved badly for years, what they did yesterday represents a new low, even for them," he wrote.

Asked for comment, an Apple representative sent this statement to Inc.:

We're happy to support the success of all developers--including Spotify, which has the most successful music streaming app in the world. The changes we're sharing for apps in the European Union give developers choice--with new options to distribute iOS apps and process payments. Every developer can choose to stay on the same terms in place today. And under the new terms, more than 99 percent of developers would pay the same or less to Apple.

Ek is right that Apple's new business terms look like they're intended to circumvent a law that the company doesn't like. But he may be the last person in the world who should make that point. His LinkedIn post, and a longer statement on Spotify's website, argued that app developers are faced with an impossible choice, because accepting Apple's new business terms would make it impossible for app-makers--including Spotify--to earn money. "Spotify itself faces an untenable situation," he wrote. Which is a beautiful irony, because that's exactly what vast numbers of musicians have said about Spotify.

The company has been a boon to large record companies, allowing them to earn money on their large catalogs of music. But most musicians say it's been a financial disaster. Since most are paid less than half a cent for each stream of their songs, according to one calculation, it would take around 360,000 streams a month just to earn minimum wage. Meantime, streaming services in general and Spotify in particular have destroyed the market for album sales--once an important source of income for musicians. (Streaming payment formulas are devilishly complex. Here's a closer look from music analytics company Soundcharts if you want to dive into the details.)

Inevitably, this has colored some people's reactions to Ek's LinkedIn tirade. "When you start to pay artists properly we might listen....." commented PwC strategic advisor Colin Payne, for example. Ek's net worth is estimated at $3.7 billion, while 97 percent of artists on Spotify have earned less than $1,000 from their music there. They can't be pleased with this, and yet, just like developers on the Apple App Store, they can't afford to stay away.

Given these realities, Ek should have known how bad it would look for him to call out another tech company with outsized power for being too greedy. You can learn from his example. Next time you want to comment publicly on what another company does, ask yourself whether it's the right thing to say--and also whether you're the right person to say it.

Sign up for our weekly roundup on the latest in tech

Privacy Policy

QOSHE - Spotify CEO Daniel Ek Just Blasted Apple for Abusing Its Power. It's a Remarkable Irony - Minda Zetlin
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Spotify CEO Daniel Ek Just Blasted Apple for Abusing Its Power. It's a Remarkable Irony

2 1
30.01.2024

How I Got Mark Cuban to Answer My Email in 7 Minutes Flat

Why Investors Are Hungry For Cybersecurity IPOs

In Another Economic Bright Spot, the Fed's Preferred Inflation Gauge Cools in December

Emma Grede's Favorite Books Include Titles by Peter Thiel, Melinda Gates, Brené Brown, and Eric Schmidt

VC Funding in 2024: High-Profile Departures, Layoffs and a Glut of Investors Struggling to Generate Returns

This Founder Is on a Mission to Make Information More Accessible for the Hard-of-Sight Community

Does the Election Calculus of Reid Hoffman and Bill Ackman Add Up?

This piece has been updated with a statement from Apple.

Daniel Ek, founder and CEO of music streaming service Spotify took to LinkedIn on Friday to complain long and loud about Apple's new policies for its app store in Europe. Ek may have a point that what Apple's doing is questionable, if not actually illegal. But he is absolutely the wrong person to make that point.

Spotify has been publicly lambasted by musicians ranging from the late David Crosby to Radiohead's Thom Yorke, who say the company makes it nearly impossible for musicians who aren't superstars to make a living at their craft. So when Ek turned around and made almost the same complaint about Apple's treatment of app developers, the messenger's reputation may have drowned out the message. It's a lesson every business leader or entrepreneur should consider before sharing an opinion in a public forum.

Apple has long taken a firm stand against "sideloading"--allowing........

© Inc.com


Get it on Google Play