menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

What’s Behind Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Crusade?

32 0
05.08.2026

Get audio access with any FP subscription. Subscribe Now ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

Get audio access with any FP subscription.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

On June 30, Nadiem Makarim, a prominent Indonesian tech entrepreneur, was sentenced to 10 years in prison on corruption charges stemming from his time as Indonesia’s education minister.

Makarim’s case is the highest profile in a string of investigations under President Prabowo Subianto, who made tackling corruption a centerpiece of his populist election campaign and his presidency since 2024. He pledged to recover stolen assets, strengthen law enforcement, and take down those he deems to be part of the corrupt elite, regardless of status or political standing.

On June 30, Nadiem Makarim, a prominent Indonesian tech entrepreneur, was sentenced to 10 years in prison on corruption charges stemming from his time as Indonesia’s education minister.

Makarim’s case is the highest profile in a string of investigations under President Prabowo Subianto, who made tackling corruption a centerpiece of his populist election campaign and his presidency since 2024. He pledged to recover stolen assets, strengthen law enforcement, and take down those he deems to be part of the corrupt elite, regardless of status or political standing.

Other high-profile investigations during Prabowo’s term have involved politically connected businessmen, state-owned enterprises, and former ministers. In July, Indonesia’s top anti-corruption prosecutor Febrie Adriansyah resigned from his role in the attorney general’s office after police raids uncovered a stash of gold bars and almost $20 million in cash in a residence that he owns. Adriansyah is now facing allegations of corruption and money laundering connected to several state-owned enterprise cases. (He has denied any wrongdoing.)

Prabowo’s supporters argue that these investigations demonstrate a willingness to pursue corruption at the highest levels, even when it implicates popular public figures such as Makarim. Critics say they instead reflect selective enforcement and political maneuvering, rather than genuine institutional reform.

While many investigations may be entirely legitimate, a closer look at who is being targeted, the institutional rivalries behind certain cases, and the government’s limited appetite for deeper reform raises questions about whether Indonesia is building a stronger anti-corruption system or simply reshuffling power among the country’s political and economic elite.

Despite broad public support for Prabowo’s anti-corruption crackdowns, the sentencing of Makarim, a symbol of the country’s tech sector ambitions, is attracting an unusually strong backlash at a time when Indonesia is facing economic headwinds, flagging foreign investment, and a slumping currency.

In 2010, before entering politics, Ivy League-educated Makarim founded the ride-hailing platform Gojek, which he transformed into a “super app” offering food delivery, digital payments, and other online services. After merging with e-commerce giant Tokopedia in 2021 to form GoTo, the business became Indonesia’s first “unicorn”—a privately held company valued at more than $1 billion—and later its first........

© Foreign Policy