Carney Wants to Privatize Airports. It’s a Terrible Idea
Fact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation
Articles Business Environment Health Politics Arts & Culture Society
Special Series Hope You’re Well For the Love of the Game Living Rooms In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration Terra Cognita More special series >
For the Love of the Game
In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration
More special series >
Events The Walrus Talks The Walrus Video Room The Walrus Leadership Roundtables The Walrus Leadership Forums Article Club
The Walrus Video Room
The Walrus Leadership Roundtables
The Walrus Leadership Forums
Subscribe Renew your subscription Change your address Magazine Issues Newsletters Podcasts
Renew your subscription
The Walrus Lab Hire The Walrus Lab Amazon First Novel Award
Amazon First Novel Award
Carney Wants to Privatize Airports. It’s a Terrible Idea
Be ready to pay more for everything
Around 2,000 people gathered in Toronto’s Nathan Phillips Square on September 14, preparing to march to the Art Gallery of Ontario, where Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much hyped Canada Investment Summit was holding a gala dinner to open the event.
The Carney government plans to open four of Canada’s publicly owned airports to private investment
Since April 2025’s federal election, there have been 328 cases of companies in the air travel sector lobbying Liberal politicians
Privatized airports would mean less oversight to protect Canadian workers
The protesters held signs that said “No deals behind closed doors” and “Billionaires not welcome here.” They chanted, “Ce n’est qu’un début”—this is just the beginning. Many are seeing the writing on the wall: Canada’s assets are for sale. Privatization is on the way. Carney wants to have $1 trillion worth of investments in Canada, bringing mass capital into our sluggish economy, mostly around infrastructure projects. From natural gas to oil pipelines, everything is on the table.
But one specific project has received more media attention than others: opening Canada’s publicly owned airports to private investment—specifically Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Calgary. “Following best practice in other countries,” Carney said on September 15, a day after a federal Liberal caucus call to discuss the initiative, “the Government of Canada will retain ownership of the underlying land and assets,” but they’ll bring in private capital to maximize growth.
Backlash from unions and worker groups has been swift. The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) issued a statement opposing any form of a sale as well as any transfer of ownership and control. Mark Hancock, president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which represents more than 20,000 airline workers across eleven airlines, said, “There is no magic to airport privatization: private investors expect a return, and Canadians will be the ones paying for it.” The Canadian Airports Council came out in favour of the country’s “made-in-Canada model” that’s provided decades of “stable, sovereign and financially sustainable approach to managing critical national infrastructure.” The list goes on.
The biggest advocate for change is private industry. It loves when major infrastructure gets turned over to them. For them, it’s win-win. But for Canadians, it’s lose-lose.
The late historian Tony Judt explained privatization in his final talk at New York University in 2009. “The cult of privatization has taken over Western governments. Why? The shorthand version is that it’s cheap.” He explained that, in the short term, privatizing saves a bit of cash, gets a bit of money for the state, but then, for important sectors (such as public transport), it creates a monopoly for private industry. This causes prices to rise rapidly for consumers.
“Private investors are attracted to newly privatized infrastructure because it is sold at less than its........
