Belonging Is the Foundation of Jewish Resilience
Antisemitism reaches deeper than policy – and so must our response.
A friend recently told me that before entering certain professional spaces, she pauses and scans the room. She does not expect something to happen. But she wants to know where she stands- Is it safe to say something Jewish here?
That quiet calculation has become increasingly familiar across Jewish communities in the United States and around the world. It is rarely dramatic. More often it appears in small internal negotiations: whether to wear a Magen David openly, whether to speak Hebrew in public, whether to correct something said casually about Israel.
Something has shifted – and not only in the headlines. There is a quietly spreading exhaustion in Jewish communal life. Not just from the news cycle, but from something older and harder to name: the sense that no matter how much we advocate, protest, educate, or document, we are still waking up in the same world.
This is not an argument for giving up. Advocacy, legal protection, political engagement – these are essential and must continue. But if the strategies we have relied on have not produced the change we seek, then leadership requires us to ask a harder question: What might we be missing?
Antisemitism Lives in the Body
We tend to frame antisemitism as a problem of ideology – something that can be countered with facts, corrected through policy, or diminished through representation. And it can. But that framing captures only part of the picture.
Antisemitism also operates beneath the level of discourse. It penetrates identity, belonging, and the nervous system. It creates chronic vigilance – a low-grade alertness that never fully turns off. It produces fragmentation: the sense of having to manage different versions of oneself depending on the room. It generates dislocation, even in spaces that appear outwardly........
