‘I come here with no intention to lecture anybody’. David Cameron’s line mid-press conference summed up the Foreign Secretary’s approach on his trip stateside. Appearing alongside his counterpart Anthony Blinken, Cameron emphasised the extent to which Britain and America are acting in lockstep on Ukraine, Gaza and other various crises. ‘In a time of danger like this international affairs, close alliances really matter’ he said.

Cameron’s trepidation is understandable: he is due to have meetings later today with skeptical congressional leaders on giving further aid to Ukraine. On his last visit to Washington, Cameron suggested that to not provide further funds risked ‘replicating weakness displayed against Hitler in the 1930s’; comments which prompted a mixed reaction from hostile Republicans. This time, he was at pains to insist ‘it is not for foreign politicians to tell legislators in another country what to do’, with his arguments explicitly couched in terms of America’s own self-interest.

‘I think it is up to the interests of US security that Putin fails in his illegal invasion’ he continued, noting that hostile actors in Tehran, Pyongyang and Beijing looking at how the US stands by its Ukrainian allies. This has been a theme of Cameron’s visit this week. Ahead of his dinner with Donald Trump, the former Prime Minister argued that America should stand by Ukraine to ‘show that borders matter’ – a Trumpian argument if ever there was one.

Blinken was happy to echo Cameron’s fighting talk on Ukraine. The Secretary of State even argued that the major beneficiary of American military aid was actually the American labour market, owing to increased investment in domestic munitions factories. On Gaza, both men walked the line between support for Israel with criticism of excesses like last week’s attack on seven aid workers. Both even ‘committed news’. Blinken conceded that the US does not have a day for a potential Israeli operation in Rafah in southern Gaza. Instead he stressed that the opposite is true because the two nations are expected to hold talks next week on alternatives for a Rafah operation.

Cameron meanwhile revealed that he has had reviewed updated legal advice on whether Israel is breaking humanitarian law. ‘The latest assessment leaves our position on export licences unchanged’ he said. ‘This is consistent with the advice that I and other ministers have received and as ever we will keep the position under review.’ But, he added, ‘Let me be clear though, we continue to have grave concerns around the humanitarian access issue in Gaza, both for the period that was assessed and subsequently.’

The main fun though for the assembled journalists was Cameron being asked about his dinner with Donald Trump, given his previous disobliging remarks about the president. Unsurprisingly, the former premier opted not to address these and repeatedly insisted that he would not go into what was said at the pair’s dinner. He instead turned the question around by focusing on increased Nato spending, pointing out that the number of countries hitting their two per cent target has risen from three in 2014 ‘when I was chairing the Nato conference’ to twenty now.

Diplomatic and discreet, it was the kind of answer which showed why Rishi Sunak chose to bring him back as Foreign Secretary last November.

QOSHE - Cameron prefers charm to offensive in Blinken love-in - James Heale
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Cameron prefers charm to offensive in Blinken love-in

6 0
09.04.2024

‘I come here with no intention to lecture anybody’. David Cameron’s line mid-press conference summed up the Foreign Secretary’s approach on his trip stateside. Appearing alongside his counterpart Anthony Blinken, Cameron emphasised the extent to which Britain and America are acting in lockstep on Ukraine, Gaza and other various crises. ‘In a time of danger like this international affairs, close alliances really matter’ he said.

Cameron’s trepidation is understandable: he is due to have meetings later today with skeptical congressional leaders on giving further aid to Ukraine. On his last visit to Washington, Cameron suggested that to not provide further funds risked ‘replicating weakness displayed against Hitler in the 1930s’; comments which prompted a mixed reaction from hostile Republicans. This time, he was at........

© The Spectator


Get it on Google Play