Last night, Donald Trump took the stage and announced in a bizarre, rambling speech what he framed as a gift to America’s troops: a one-time, $1,776 “warrior dividend,” a $1,776 payment pitched as gratitude for service members and veterans. Wrapped in Revolutionary War imagery and just in time for the holidays, the promise was sold as proof that Trump takes care of our warriors. But beneath the applause and bunting, the announcement amounted to another empty, Trump-branded PR exercise.

In reality, what Trump sold as a Christmas “warrior dividend” wasn’t a new benefit at all. As Politico reported, the money came from a military housing stipend Congress had already approved months earlier to address lagging quality-of-life conditions for service members. Under Trump, that benefit was simply rebranded, repackaged, and redelivered — not as a right earned through service, but as a personal gift bestowed from above.

Trump’s sudden burst of generosity comes after years of deliberate harm to veterans, military families, and the institutions meant to support them.

Among veterans, the reaction was sharper — and darker. Former service members joked the dividend felt like a “steak and lobster deployment dinner,” the old military omen: When leadership suddenly splurges, bad news usually follows. Combat veteran and military accountability activist Greg Stoker summed it up more bluntly on Instagram, calling the announcement “corny as hell,” a sentiment echoed across veteran circles who’ve learned to distrust flashy gestures that arrive just before cuts, purges, or new demands.

That context matters. Trump’s sudden burst of generosity comes after years of deliberate harm to veterans, military families, and the institutions meant to support them. Set against that record, the “warrior dividend” isn’t gratitude — it’s the latest insult. For $1,776, a number that barely covers a month’s rent in much of the country, Trump seems to believe he can purchase loyalty, silence dissent, and paper over structural harm.

“Suckers”

This indifference isn’t an abstraction. Last week on Capitol Hill, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem assured lawmakers that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has “not deported” military veterans. As she spoke, an Army veteran appeared on screen from exile. Sae Joon Park, a Purple Heart recipient wounded in combat, had been deported to South Korea after nearly 50 years in the United States, ordered to self-deport over decades-old drug charges tied to his post-traumatic stress disorder. As Noem offered perfunctory thanks for his service and claimed her hands were tied, Rep. Seth Magaziner, D-R.I., cut in: Park had taken two bullets for his country — would the administration help him come home? Noem promised only to “look at his case.” The lie had already been exposed.

Park’s case is not an anomaly. Under Trump, military service has offered little protection from detention or deportation. During his first term, immigration authorities placed at least 250 veterans into removal proceedings and deported 92 of them, many of whom have service-connected trauma from their time in combat. Among them was Miguel Perez Jr., an Army veteran who served two tours in Afghanistan before being deported to Mexico. Just last month, Jose Barco, a Purple Heart recipient wounded in Iraq, was deported from a detention center in Arizona at 4 a.m.

Treating war heroes as disposable reflects how Trump fundamentally understands the military. He does not treat the military as a civic institution bound by mutual obligation or constitutional restraint. He treats it as a coercive instrument — a disciplined force that can be displayed, redirected, or withdrawn depending on political need. Loyalty, in this framework, is not owed to the........

© The Intercept