menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Dems Show Just How Low They Can Go In Latest Ballot Schemes

3 0
yesterday

1 Trending: After Claiming ‘Baseball Is For Everyone,’ MLB Threatens Players For Expressing Christian Faith

2 Trending: Massachusetts Judge Orders Trump To Put Leftist Propaganda Back Up At National Parks

3 Trending: FBI Raids Leftist Group With History Of Suspect Voter Registration Practices

4 Trending: Supreme Court To Hear Major Case On Trump Admin’s Detention Of Illegal Aliens

Dems Show Just How Low They Can Go In Latest Ballot Schemes

Democrats once again tried to keep competition of the ballot in Wisconsin, and worked an identity scam in Alaska.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Two recent ballot battles more than 3,400 miles apart tell you all you need to know about just how nasty Democrats play for power. 

In one case, Democrats enlisted the assistance of a Milwaukee law firm in a failed attempt to take out Green Party competition — a familiar play from the left’s political playbook. In another, liberals in Alaska appear to be behind a shady scheme to run a convenient “Republican” named Dan Sullivan against incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan in Alaska’s August GOP Senate primary. 

Handsome former First Lady Michelle Obama liked to unironically say of Democrats, “When they go low, we go high.” In Alaska, Wisconsin and across the nation, the question increasingly is, “How low can Democrats go?”

It’s Not Easy Being Green 

Earlier this month, Pete Karas became the latest Green Party candidate to face the political grist mill of Democrats. Karas, running for the mostly ceremonial post of Wisconsin secretary of state, was forced to fight a frivolous challenge to all of his nearly 3,000 signatures on his petition for candidacy. 

Gregory Walz-Chojnacki, affiliated with the state Democrats but not running for the statewide position, asked the Wisconsin Elections Commission to toss out the 2,937 signatures, significantly more than the 2,000 state law requires. Walz-Chojnacki made two spurious claims to justify his challenge: that Karas’ signature collectors may have lived out of state, and that dozens of the pages were blurry. 

Karas and his Madison attorney, Skylar Croy, presented evidence that all circulators under penalty of law, stated on the forms that they resided in Wisconsin and noted their addresses. As to Walz-Chojnacki’s claims that the submitted forms were “blurry,” the challenger in his complaint did not........

© The Federalist