menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

United States v. Hemani: SCOTUS to Hear Arguments in Important Second Amendment Case

5 0
03.03.2026

Colorado Bill Preventing ICE Agents From Joining State or Local Police Stirs ‘Direct Conflict’ With Feds, Republican Warns

United States v. Hemani: SCOTUS to Hear Arguments in Important Second Amendment Case

EXCLUSIVE: Alternative Pediatrician Org Urges Doctors to Reject Transgenderism

US Will Take Action to Mitigate Oil Price Spike for Americans, Rubio Says

Colorado Bill Preventing ICE Agents From Joining State or Local Police Stirs ‘Direct Conflict’ With Feds, Republican Warns

Small Georgia Town Is at the Center of Latest ICE Fight 

It’s Official: Illegal Alien-Loving Dems Cannot Stand American Citizens

How the Heartland Is Reacting to Trump’s State of the Union

 InternationalCommentary

Cracking Down on China’s Trade Cheating the Right Way

Time for Denmark and the United States to Secure Greenland

Daughter Pleads for Father’s Release From Chinese Prison 

What to Expect in PLA Activities Near Taiwan Leading Up to Trump and Xi Summit

War Powers Showdown: House and Senate Vote on Operation Epic Fury

EXCLUSIVE: Major Pro-Life Group Endorses Ohio’s Jon Husted for Senate

Golden Dome for America: The Secrecy Is Rational—the Cost Is Manageable—and the Imperative Is Inarguable

Amid Shutdown, 5 Major Homeland Security Responsibilities Are Unfunded

Why Is Virginia’s Redistricting Referendum on Pause?

Georgia Voters Support SAVE America Act—Even as State’s Democrat Senators Oppose It

Ohio Voters Send a ‘Clear Message’ With Support for SAVE America Act Provisions

Trump Calls on Senate to Pass SAVE America Act

Hegseth: Iran Strikes ‘Not Iraq,’ ‘Not Endless’

BREAKING: Trump Says Khamenei Is Dead. What Happens Now in Iran? 

International PoliticsSecurityNews

‘MAJOR COMBAT OPERATIONS’: Trump Announces Joint US-Israel Operation Against Iran

‘War Was Visited Upon These People’: Play About Oct. 7 Comes to DC

 International Commentary

Russia Operating ‘Systematic Child Abduction Operation,’ EU Ambassador Says

Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond 

OH BABY! Couples Could Make Big Money on Trump Accounts

What Comes Next for Venezuela? State Department Official Explains

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s Cost-Benefit Analysis for Striking Iran

What Susan Rice Really Meant by Her Retribution Threat

Health Care Commentary

Victor Davis Hanson: Cancer Update, ‘Your Prayers Work, Folks’

Victor Davis Hanson: The Pros and Cons of America’s Strike on Iran

United States v. Hemani: SCOTUS to Hear Arguments in Important Second Amendment Case

The Supreme Court (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

Zack Smith / @tzsmith

Zack Smith is a senior legal fellow and manager of the Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program for the Institute for Constitutional Government at The Heritage Foundation.

As the Supreme Court returns to hearing oral arguments this week, it will take up a technical—yet consequential—criminal law case.

In United States v. Hemani, the Justices will consider whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which bars anyone “who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” from “possess[ing] … any firearm or ammunition,” violates the Second Amendment.

If this provision sounds familiar, it should. That’s because the Justice Department charged Hunter Biden with, and a jury convicted him of, violating it—before his dad pardoned him.

In this case, the federal government charged Ali Hemani with being an “unlawful user” of marijuana—which is a controlled substance—based on his statements that he used it several times a week—though he provided no more details about frequency, quantity, or timing.

While it’s irrelevant to the specific charges at issue here, the government also suspects Hemani, who traveled to Iran to mourn the death of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps General Qasem Soleimani, of having terrorist ties and dealing drugs to support and fund his terror-related activities.

Nonetheless, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with Hemani—based on its rationale in a previously decided case—that this statutory provision does violate the Second Amendment. So, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to hear the case, which it agreed to do.

In addition to challenging the statute on Second Amendment grounds, Hemani also argues that the statute is unconstitutionally vague because it does not clearly define who qualifies as an unlawful user of a controlled substance who, in turn, is prohibited from possessing a firearm. Is using a controlled substance once a week enough? Once a month? Once a year? Once a decade? Hemani says that no one can know.

As for the Second Amendment arguments, both Hemani and the government point to the Supreme Court’s recent Rahimi decision where the Court upheld a different provision (subsection (8)) of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which allows those subject to a domestic violence restraining order to be disarmed while subject to such an order.

There, the Court made clear that to determine whether a certain statutory provision violates the Second Amendment it will look to history and tradition to help make that determination. Moreover, the Court said that while an exact “historical twin” is not required for the provision to comport with the Constitution, there must be an adequate “historical analogue.” This prompted disputes among the Justices about the level of generality—or how close—a historical practice must be to qualify as a historical analogue and the role that post-ratification practices should play in the Court’s evaluation.

Here, the government argues that founding practices—such as criminal vagrancy laws, civil commitment, and sureties—designed to deal with habitual drunkards provide the appropriate historical analogues.

It also argues that post-ratification history supports its position by noting that illegal use of controlled substances did not become a problem until the late 19th or early 20th centuries. And once states took notice of it, most passed legislation to temporarily disarm those who used or abused those substances.

Finally, the government notes that even if the Justices agree with all of Hemani’s arguments, 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) provides a mechanism for a person to ask the Attorney General to essentially declare that he is not prohibited from possessing a firearm. And if the Attorney General denies the application, the person can seek judicial relief.

For many years, this process was practically unavailable because the Attorney General had delegated authority to the ATF to review these applications. And Congress had passed appropriations’ riders to prohibit funds from being used for this purpose. But AG Pam Bondi has withdrawn the delegation and has reinstituted the review process.

For his part, Hemani, of course, disagrees with all the government’s assertions.

It’s also notable that this case has scrambled the usual ideological alliances with deep blue states such as California and Illinois filing an amicus brief in support of the Trump Justice Department’s position and other entities, who are usually supportive of the Trump Administration’s polices (though not all are), filing briefs in support of Hemani.

Regardless, two things are certain: This will be a consequential case no matter what the Justices decide, and it will be yet another important marker along the way where the Justices will elaborate how history and tradition should be used by courts to inform their constitutional decisions.

US Supreme Court to Hear Second Amendment Case Tuesday

Justices Hear Arguments on Concealed Carry in Stores

EEOC Urges White Males to Report Discrimination—And Promptly

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  


© The Daily Signal