I’ve been thinking about empathy lately.

You know, empathy. That capacity to put yourself in someone else’s shows and wonder how they can possibly walk with heels that high.

I’ve decided that there’s a distinct lack of empathy from some politicians and it’s this lack from the Coalition that’s one of the possible reasons why – in spite of all the criticism they’ve copped – that Labor are still in front in most polls.

Yes, I know that you’ve probably read many articles about how they’re slipping in the polls and, if I were a political adviser, I’d be suggesting that they do something to try and arrest the slide. I mean, they can’t rely on media outlets giving them a boost by interviewing members of the Coalition front bench. When people start to wonder why they voted Labor up pops Peter Dutton/Angus Taylor/Sussan Ley/Jane Hume and most people go: “Ah, now I remember!”

Of course, if you were one of the few people who managed to sit through the first episode of “Nemesis”, you’d have been reminded about how Abbott lost 30 opinion polls before being replaced by Turnbull. You’d have also been reminded that when a spill was first called by Abbott, nobody stood against him so his opponent was an “empty chair”. Now, I don’t want to make it sound like the chair was unimpressive in its attempt to lead the Liberal Party, but I take the fact that it received over thirty votes to be more a reflection on how the party felt about Credlin’s leadership than anything that the chair did.

When the time came for Turnbull, he managed to turn that around and win a few polls before people realised that he had managed to convince certain factions that he wouldn’t be doing the sort of things that Tony did. In fact, he’d be happy just having the title PM and an office window where he could stare out and wonder whether this is how dogs chasing cars feel if they ever catch one. It didn’t take long before Turnbull had the government behind in the polls and, after scraping back in 2016 thanks to a shock result in Chisholm, there was a general expectation that he’d lose the 2019 election. Peter Dutton put up his hand telling people that if anyone was going to lose the 2019 election it’s be him and, after successfully causing Turnbull to take his bat and ball and go home, Peter opened the door for Scott Morrison.

I bring all this up to remind everyone that, in the end, people are reluctant to change the government. When it’s polling day, they’re much more likely to go, “Mm, things aren’t really that bad, maybe I shouldn’t risk the other mob because who knows what they’ll do?”

Which is why the Liberals are running so hard on the idea of a broken promise and the idea that you can’t trust Labor. If you think back to the last time that the Coalition won government from Opposition their strategy was similar: Labor lied about the carbon tax, Labor have us in a budget crisis, and we’ll stop the boats and bring a stronger economy thanks to Jobsandgrowth. Their main positive policy was the paid maternity leave which they scrapped without it being broken promise because, well, we just couldn’t afford it and that’s not a broken promise because… Look, no boats!

However, as Heraclitus said: No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.

The essential problem with trying to jump into the same river for the Liberals – apart from Peter Dutton looking even worse in speedos than Abbott did – is related to their lack of empathy for anyone but the fortunate few.

Abbott managed to create a lot of concern about a “carbon tax” which was “great big tax on everything”. While anyone with an understanding of the issue understood that not only was it not on everything, it wasn’t even a tax, the fact that this broken promise might make things more expensive was a concern to people. However, I suspect it’s going to be much harder to get most people worked up by telling them that they’re getting a tax cut thanks to Labor changing their mind on Stage 3. Similarly when Keith from Kew complains that he’s only getting $3729 instead of double that, we’re hardly going to have people joining him in street marches or contributing to his GoFundMe campaign to help him manage with school fees.

And lately, the Keystone cops of the shadow cabinet have been demonstrating their empathy for landlords by suggesting that we can’t trust Labor and that negative gearing will next to go, along with franking credits. Why negative gearing and franking credits?

Well, I suspect that in their minds, it played out well in 2019 when Shorten lost the election after proposing changes to these. Of course, the trouble with elections is that when people vote they don’t add something about the reason they voted that way. This enables people to create all sorts of narratives which suit their particular agenda even though nobody has any real idea why Susie from Sunshine and Barry from Berwick voted for a particular party. I’m sure that if you could capture the thoughts of all the voters at the time of voting as well as the rusted-ons and the carefully considered swinger, there’d be a number who’d be thinking something like:

“I’m not voting for that candidate because they look like my ex.”

“I think I’ll vote for Jim because he got a grant for the footy club to build the clubrooms.”

“Mm, that one wears glasses so he must be intelligent.”

“I’m not voting for the government because they’re too woke and they want women as candidates.”

“I met our local member at a barbecue and she agreed with me on most things so I expect that’s her party’s policy.”

“Gee, I should have taken one of those how-to-vote things. Is it the highest number for your favourite candidate or should I put a one beside him.”

“My dad said that he hates liberals because they’re commies so I guess I better vote for someone else. Mm, communists are red so I guess I should vote for the Green Party.”

And so on.

As far as 2019 is concerned, I strongly suspect that a number of people didn’t think about negative gearing or franking credits or electric vehicles because these things weren’t part of their immediate concerns. However, those “Back In Black” mugs gave the impression that, even though the Liberals were heartless, cigar-smoking bastards who thought that you weren’t entitled to anything, they at least knew how to manage the economy and all the pain of Abbott, Hockey, Turnbull, Morrison and company was for a purpose and they deserved to be given another term.

So if they try to re-prosecute the 2019 election, the run the very real risk of people going wait a minute, you promised the budget would be back in the black and it wasn’t.

Not only that, but it’s harder to get renters to empathise for the poor landlord who just put up their rent by more than the interest rate rises and it’s hard to get someone struggling to buy their first home to be upset that changes to negative gearing may force some poor landlord to sell. As far as the franking credits go, most voters didn’t really understand what was being proposed. Labor weren’t taking away franking credits; they were simply proposing to close a loophole where if you paid no or very little income tax you could convert the taxed part to a refund. Franking credits were to stop people being taxed twice, but under the change that Howard made, some share income isn’t even taxed once.

It’s not true that the Liberal Party don’t know how to show empathy. The trouble is that they’re giving too much of their empathy to landlords, self-funded retirees and those with incomes over $150,000, rather than the unemployed, the homeless and those struggling who’ll be glad of the Stage 3 changes. Nothing wrong with that, but I suspect it’s no way to win an election.

QOSHE - Empathy And The Unfortunate Few Who Own Your… - Rossleigh Brisbane
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Empathy And The Unfortunate Few Who Own Your…

7 24
01.02.2024

I’ve been thinking about empathy lately.

You know, empathy. That capacity to put yourself in someone else’s shows and wonder how they can possibly walk with heels that high.

I’ve decided that there’s a distinct lack of empathy from some politicians and it’s this lack from the Coalition that’s one of the possible reasons why – in spite of all the criticism they’ve copped – that Labor are still in front in most polls.

Yes, I know that you’ve probably read many articles about how they’re slipping in the polls and, if I were a political adviser, I’d be suggesting that they do something to try and arrest the slide. I mean, they can’t rely on media outlets giving them a boost by interviewing members of the Coalition front bench. When people start to wonder why they voted Labor up pops Peter Dutton/Angus Taylor/Sussan Ley/Jane Hume and most people go: “Ah, now I remember!”

Of course, if you were one of the few people who managed to sit through the first episode of “Nemesis”, you’d have been reminded about how Abbott lost 30 opinion polls before being replaced by Turnbull. You’d have also been reminded that when a spill was first called by Abbott, nobody stood against him so his opponent was an “empty chair”. Now, I don’t want to make it sound like the chair was unimpressive in its attempt to lead the Liberal Party, but I take the fact that it received over thirty votes to be more a reflection on how the party felt about Credlin’s leadership than anything that the chair did.

When the time came for Turnbull, he managed to turn that around and win a few polls before people realised that he had managed to convince certain factions that he wouldn’t be doing the sort of things that Tony did. In fact, he’d be happy just having the title PM and an office window where he could stare out and wonder whether this is how dogs chasing cars feel if they ever catch one. It didn’t take long before Turnbull had the government behind in the........

© The AIM Network


Get it on Google Play