The recent Post Office scandal in the U.K. saw postmasters accused and prosecuted for crimes they did not commit due to inept software and a huge cover-up lasting decades. The suffering, shame, and humiliation should not be underestimated.
In some cases, it led to suicide. The scandal has shed light on the shocking behaviour of employees of the Post Office, its software provider, Fujitsu, and possibly members of the U.K. government. Those who knew innocent people were suffering such injustice yet did nothing have behaved in an unethical and immoral yet very human way. To understand such behaviours, we can refer to two classic psychology experiments: the Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram's Electric Shock Experiment. These works have provided everlasting insights into the influence of authority, social roles, and the power of situational factors on human behaviour.
The Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) aimed to investigate how ordinary individuals would behave when assigned the roles of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison environment. The experiment revealed that individuals placed in positions of authority tend to adopt aggressive and abusive behaviour. This phenomenon of power corrupting morality has become known as the "Lucifer Effect." Positions of power and authority may have led individuals within the hierarchies of the Post Office, Fujitsu, and the U.K. government to act in ways they would not have acted under other circumstances.
Although all those involved are in some way accountable, we might consider that those highest up are more to blame, for it is human nature to diffuse responsibility to those we see as authority figures. Once again, a classic psychology experiment aids our understanding.
Stanley Milgram's Electric Shock Experiment (1963) explored the extent to which individuals would obey an authority figure's instructions, even if it meant delivering potentially lethal electric shocks to another person. The study demonstrates that a significant percentage of participants were willing to administer shocks simply because they were instructed to do so by the experimenter.
This work highlights the power of obedience to authority and the potential for individuals to engage in harmful actions when under pressure from those in positions of power. In the Post Office scandal, employees may have felt compelled to follow orders from superiors, leading them to engage in unethical behaviour.
Both the Stanford Prison Experiment and Milgram's Electric Shock Experiment underscore the importance of conformity and social influence on human behaviour. In the Post Office scandal, employees may have succumbed to the pressure of conforming to the prevailing culture within the organisation. The fear of going against the norms and expectations set by superiors, combined with the desire to fit in, seems to have influenced their actions.
The two experiments highlight individuals' potential to abandon their moral compass in favour of adhering to group dynamics.
Cognitive dissonance, a psychological concept explored by Leon Festinger (1959), suggests that individuals experience discomfort when their beliefs and actions are in conflict. This discomfort often leads people to justify their actions or modify their beliefs to alleviate the dissonance.
In the scandal, employees involved may have rationalised their behaviours, convincing themselves that they were acting in the best interest of the organisation or that their actions were necessary to maintain their livelihoods. Cognitive dissonance can help explain why individuals engage in unethical behaviour while still perceiving themselves as moral individuals.
The unethical behaviour inherent in the Post Office scandal can be explained through classic psychology research familiar to anyone who has studied the subject. These works maintain our interest because they shed light on human behaviour and the influence of authority, social roles, conformity, and cognitive dissonance.
By keeping these experiments in mind when such scandals hit the headlines, we can gain valuable insights into the behaviour of individuals and strive to create organisations that foster ethical conduct and safeguard against abuses and the human consequences of power.
References
Festinger, L. (1959). Cognitive dissonance. New York.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(4), 371.
Zimbardo, P. G., Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Jaffe, D. (1971). The Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo, Incorporated.
The U.K. Post Office Scandal
14
0
11.01.2024
The recent Post Office scandal in the U.K. saw postmasters accused and prosecuted for crimes they did not commit due to inept software and a huge cover-up lasting decades. The suffering, shame, and humiliation should not be underestimated.
In some cases, it led to suicide. The scandal has shed light on the shocking behaviour of employees of the Post Office, its software provider, Fujitsu, and possibly members of the U.K. government. Those who knew innocent people were suffering such injustice yet did nothing have behaved in an unethical and immoral yet very human way. To understand such behaviours, we can refer to two classic psychology experiments: the Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram's Electric Shock Experiment. These works have provided everlasting insights into the influence of authority, social roles, and the power of situational factors on human behaviour.
The Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) aimed to investigate how ordinary individuals would behave when assigned the roles of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison environment. The experiment revealed that individuals placed in positions of........
© Psychology Today
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Rami G Khouri
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
