Take our Ambition Test

Find a career counselor near me.

Job crafting research has shifted from asking whether it works to understanding how it works.

The idea now extends beyond individual jobs to careers, teams, and hybrid work.

Research increasingly emphasizes when job crafting helps, for whom, and under what conditions.

Twenty-five years ago, Amy Wrzesniewski and Jane Dutton published a paper that asked readers to look at work a little bit differently. Rather than viewing jobs as something organizations designed and employees simply carried out, they argued that employees could reshape their work in ways that make it more meaningful, engaging, and sustainable. They called the process job crafting.

I recently spent several days sifting through two special issues of the Journal of Business and Psychology, 41(3) and 41(4), marking the 25th anniversary. Together, they contain 19 papers. Individually, each paper tackles a fairly specific question. Collectively, though, they tell a much bigger story. I've whittled that bigger story down to three takeaways that really stood out to me.

The Questions Have Evolved

The first thing that struck me was how much the questions have evolved over 25 years.

The original paper introduced job crafting as a new way of thinking about work. Unsurprisingly, much of the early research focused on understanding whether job crafting was associated with outcomes like engagement, well-being, performance, and job satisfaction. That was an important first step. Researchers first needed to establish what job crafting was, how it could be measured, and whether it was linked to meaningful workplace outcomes.

Reading these special issues, though, it became clear that the conversation has moved forward. Very few papers were still asking whether job crafting was generally associated with positive outcomes (we’ve established that), and the ones that did were mostly examining the issue through the lens of contextual factors.........

© Psychology Today