US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Lindsay Clancy’s complex case: Letters to the Editor — Sept. 10, 2026

See more of our coverage in your search results.

The Issue: A mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case as jurors could not agree on her insanity defense.

The law that gives the jury the task of deciding whether Lindsay Clancy was insane or not is wrong (“Hit with mistrial mess,” Sept. 5).

Juries should only decide the facts of the crime. Judges should apply the insanity issue at sentencing. They are far more equipped and experienced to deal with the nuances of this situation.

Mamdani is twisting the law to socialist limits — and you’re his next target

Mamdani’s toxic Ground Zero blame game just a distraction from his questionable 9/11 beliefs

I’m a Muslim doctor who treats 9/11 victims — outraged by Hasan Piker’s venom

Like so many others, I assumed Clancy was guilty until I started watching the trial. Now I believe that she is innocent.

I am utterly shocked at how the mainstream media is not investigating what happened to her and supporting innocent until proven guilty. Even limited exposure to the trial is enough to give someone reasonable doubt.

Other than a seemingly coached confession she gave while on medication and in the midst of ICU delirium, there is not enough evidence against her. If anything, the evidence points to........

© New York Post