Readers question the national broadcaster's budget and bonuses, along with the Supreme Court's new definition of 'woman,' plus more

Re: CBC gave $15M in bonuses and a few months later cut 800 jobs: report — March 12

It puzzles me why over a billion dollars is paid annually to the Liberal Broadcasting Corporation (a.k.a. CBC), though I suppose the reason is apparent. (The Goebbels of the Liberal party.) It also puzzles me why the CBC’s president complained about the need for more money while handing out almost $15 million in bonuses.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

Another puzzle is why, after that bonus treatment, the Liberals decided to give $96 million more in tax dollars to the already enriched CBC (for a total annual budget of $1.4 billion) and then raised income and other taxes for Canadians when many have trouble funding both food and shelter.

The Trudeau government keeps pushing millions of immigrants into a Canada that lacks housing, hospitals, doctors and nurses to accommodate them. The effect was yet more poverty as it also raised interest rates. (The Bank of Canada is not really independent, is it?)

Either the federal government is totally out of touch with the common man, or it has adopted the UN’s/WEF’s strategy of starving the working poor into submission to leftist governments.

Charles Hooker, East Garafraxa, Ont.

Re: We didn’t need ‘person with a vagina’ added to the legal vernacular’ — Jamie Sarkonak, March 14

Sorry, Supreme Court, but whatever progressive dystopian logic you might use to eliminate the use of the word “woman,” you’re leaving this old-fashioned person behind. I will not refer to the women in my family, my friends or colleagues as “people with vaginas.” Talk about sterile and base, and, to most people not living in your dystopian world, just plain rude.

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Robert Vogel, Toronto

Re: Pierre Poilievre’s policy option — ‘neo-Mulroney’ or ‘post-Harper’? — Terence Corcoran, March 6

Thank you to Terence Corcoran for a clear and concise analysis of conservative values. After listening to all the nuances in the past few years as to what the political right stands for in Canada, I don’t think I am the lone conservative who was becoming increasingly confused as to what the latest definition of conservative values actually was.

Mr. Corcoran has given much needed clarity to increasingly fuzzy thinking on this subject. Based on his comments, I sincerely trust that Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative party can strongly encourage free trade both globally and more importantly, in Canada among our provinces and territories. And a decrease in invasive central government interference is required. More state intervention leads to overall decreasing prosperity.

The current feds in Canada keep trying to expand their mandate. This needs to be stopped. As has been clearly proven in the past decade, many of the decisions made by our federal government have inevitably resulted in less overall economic prosperity for all and have led to increased insecurity in light of an increasingly dangerous geopolitical world.

Glynis Van Steen, Burlington, Ont.

Re: Canadian pensions face new call to invest at home, this time from major business leaders — Barbara Shecter, March 6

A full-page ad in the National Post on March 6 from a collection of CEOs, union executives and others laments that Canadian pension funds have substantially reduced their investments in publicly traded Canadian companies. It seems that fund managers have connected increased government red tape, spending and taxes with lower returns and decided to invest elsewhere.

Instead of asking for a course correction, those who signed the letter are asking provincial and federal governments to compel Canadian pension funds to invest in their publicly traded companies. Politically connected special interest groups requesting increased government interference in the Canadian economy is a textbook example of why Canada isn’t working for many of its citizens.

Governments in Canada already restrict citizens’ spending in numerous ways — no spending our own after-tax money on health care unless approved by the government, restrictions on buying alcohol in one province and transporting it to another (enforced by the Supreme Court), and in most provinces, being unable to hire tradespeople licensed in another province. Now these business elites want the government to control the savings of millions of Canadians by dictating how pensions funds make investment decisions, undermining their primary mandate of seeking maximum returns while minimizing risks.

The rights and freedoms of Canadians are being steadily eroded by government, the bureaucracy and elites who all support each other at the expense of the country at large. Add on Bill C-63, Canada’s new Online Harms (censorship) Act and we’re getting ever closer to China’s model of government. At least they get things built.

Gary Krieger, North York, Ont.

National Post and Financial Post welcome letters to the editor (200 words or fewer). Please include your name, address and daytime phone number. Email letters@nationalpost.com. Letters may be edited for length or clarity.

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Shop top deals in spring fashion, cleaning products, home organization, fitness gear and more

Silk & Snow, Good American and Best Buy, to name a few

How these new products transformed my safari experience

Celebrity nail artist Gina Edwards sounds off on the hottest nail trends of the year.

Get spring-related deals from March 20-25

QOSHE - Letters: Why does the CBC need $1.4 billion from Canadian taxpayers? - National Post
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Letters: Why does the CBC need $1.4 billion from Canadian taxpayers?

8 0
20.03.2024

Readers question the national broadcaster's budget and bonuses, along with the Supreme Court's new definition of 'woman,' plus more

Re: CBC gave $15M in bonuses and a few months later cut 800 jobs: report — March 12

It puzzles me why over a billion dollars is paid annually to the Liberal Broadcasting Corporation (a.k.a. CBC), though I suppose the reason is apparent. (The Goebbels of the Liberal party.) It also puzzles me why the CBC’s president complained about the need for more money while handing out almost $15 million in bonuses.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

Another puzzle is why, after that bonus treatment, the Liberals decided to give $96 million more in tax dollars to the already enriched CBC (for a total annual budget of $1.4 billion) and then raised income and other taxes for Canadians when many have trouble funding both food and shelter.

The Trudeau government keeps pushing millions of immigrants into a Canada that lacks housing, hospitals, doctors and nurses to accommodate them. The effect was yet more poverty as it also raised interest rates. (The Bank of Canada is not really independent, is it?)

Either the federal government is totally out of touch with the common man, or it has adopted the UN’s/WEF’s strategy of starving the working poor into submission to leftist governments.

Charles Hooker, East Garafraxa, Ont.

Re: We didn’t need ‘person with a........

© National Post


Get it on Google Play