What if our Commons had, say, 50 candidates unattached to the major parties? Imagine that. Come with me through this thought experiment.

Politicians and commentators of all hues are having a collective nervous breakdown about the Rochdale by-election result. I don’t share their frenzy and panic, much of it based on mistruths and arrogance. Rochdale does not belong to Labour; voters were expressing human concern not radicalism; it was not the “Muslim vote” that got George Galloway the seat.

The borough is 74 per cent white, 19 per cent Asian, four per cent Black, two per cent mixed and two per cent other ethnicities. A wide range of residents chose him, and as importantly, David Tully, who finished second. Tully, a vehicle repair shop owner, received 6,638 votes – more than the Conservatives and Labour combined. Simon Kelner’s column on Tuesday about the local anti-Tory mobilisation in Totnes is further proof of voter dissatisfaction with the usual way of doing politics. This is good news.

Independents cannot be whipped and bullied into voting for government policies or opposition positions. If we’d had such a bloc in 2018, for example, they might have stopped the Tories from voting through, by a small majority, a reduction in the number of children eligible for free school meals.

Independents would also challenge the dirty tricks that are used to obstruct debates or push through legislation. Just a week ago, when the SNP attempted to get a vote calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the Speaker, Lindsay Hoyle – previously a Labour MP – decided a Labour amendment would be voted on instead, another stark example of murky dealings in the Mother of All Parliaments.

So let’s change the model.

Traditionalists on all sides will find this modest proposal quite mad or extremely alarming. I say it is the only way to save this fast rotting democracy.

Our unelected second chamber, oddly, is a better exemplar of objectivity and fairmindedness than the grubby Commons. The Lords currently has 183 crossbenchers, 23 per cent of the total, only exceeded by Tory appointees (of whom there are too many). They can and do stop governments from being overpowerful and treating the parliamentary estate as a fiefdom.

We’ve had some free spirits in the Commons. The Green Party’s Caroline Lucas has stood up, solely and heroically, for the environment and other vital concerns for many years. Martin Bell, the anti-sleaze hack in a white suit, was elected in 1997 by the good folk of Tatton; Dr Richard Taylor, a doughty defender of the NHS, was MP for Wyre Forest between 2001 and 2010; Welsh politician Dai Davies represented Blaenau Gwent between 2006 and 2010. And Galloway of course, who was previously elected as a Respect MP in two constituencies and now represents the Worker’s Party in Rochdale.

I don’t like or trust the man, but he won, and seemingly without the backing of billionaires with vested interests or the kind of media favouritism enjoyed by Nigel Farage. Both those forces imperil our system more than the Scottish hardman.

The Government has increased the sum that can be used on election campaigns by 80 per cent. We know why. It’s to facilitate multimillionaire and billionaire backers, fans who pay megabucks to get close to ministers or the PM. Labour has the same abysmal tendencies.

In September, Mohamed Amersi, a scandal-hit Conservative Party donor, said he would offer funds to the Labour party. According to The Independent, Keir Starmer’s party wouldn’t take the cash, but individual MPs could be allowed to do so. Such a decision sums up the ethically expedient leader, our next PM.

A new book, Cuckooland: Where the Rich Own the Truth by Tom Burgiss, exposes the reprehensible connections between political establishmentarians and named tycoons who seek to gain entry, influence, and sometimes profit either financially or through reputation. Back in 2016, in a survey by Transparency International UK, 76 per cent of respondents felt wealthy people exerted “undue influence” on those running the nation. Today that ecology is more fouled and normalised.

A final observation: Galloway and Tully won without the backing of right wing media outlets. Galloway – a superb orator – and Tully, a genuine man of the people, spoke to voters directly.

MPs are jittery. After Rochdale, Sunak talks of “extremism”, a disgraceful slur on those concerned about Palestinian casualties in Gaza. A Labour shadow minister tells PoliticsHome that Galloway would be “massively provocative and unhelpful on Gaza” in the House of Commons. Millions of us want the deplorable two party consensus on what has been described as genocide to be smashed. The Rochdale MP will do that resoundingly.

More disruptive voices from left to right would properly test the Commons, rock and knock the political duopoly that runs GB. If that means putting up with Galloway, so be it.

QOSHE - There is only one way we can save our fast-rotting democracy - Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

There is only one way we can save our fast-rotting democracy

4 0
06.03.2024

What if our Commons had, say, 50 candidates unattached to the major parties? Imagine that. Come with me through this thought experiment.

Politicians and commentators of all hues are having a collective nervous breakdown about the Rochdale by-election result. I don’t share their frenzy and panic, much of it based on mistruths and arrogance. Rochdale does not belong to Labour; voters were expressing human concern not radicalism; it was not the “Muslim vote” that got George Galloway the seat.

The borough is 74 per cent white, 19 per cent Asian, four per cent Black, two per cent mixed and two per cent other ethnicities. A wide range of residents chose him, and as importantly, David Tully, who finished second. Tully, a vehicle repair shop owner, received 6,638 votes – more than the Conservatives and Labour combined. Simon Kelner’s column on Tuesday about the local anti-Tory mobilisation in Totnes is further proof of voter dissatisfaction with the usual way of doing politics. This is good news.

Independents cannot be whipped and bullied into voting for government policies or opposition positions. If we’d had such a bloc in 2018, for example, they might have stopped the Tories from voting through, by a........

© iNews


Get it on Google Play