Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley analyzes redactions in the transcript from a private hearing in the Charlie Kirk assassination case and weighs in on whether cameras should be allowed in the courtroom on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’

New York Times writer and Howard University professor Nikole Hannah-Jones has long been controversial as a writer who expressly rejects objectivity and neutrality in journalism. That was most evident in her "1619 Project," which was ridiculed by historians and law professors in claiming that slavery was the driving force behind American independence. Nevertheless, the project was awarded the Pulitzer Prize, despite glaring historical errors. Yet, this month, Hannah-Jones is back on the pages of the New York Times, again rewriting history. This time, she is praising cop-killer and 1960s revolutionary Assata Shakur.

Hannah-Jones has been a lightning rod in her writings, from declaring "all journalism is activism" to spreading conspiracy theories against the police. Yet, mainstream media, including the Times, has run interference for Hannah-Jones, including the dean of the University of North Carolina trying to shut down criticism by reminding a reporter that they must all defend Hannah-Jones.

Hannah-Jones’ latest project of historical revision is a sorrowful memorial to Shakur, which shows the same disregard for facts in favor of a preferred narrative.

NY TIMES' NIKOLE HANNAH-JONES CALLS PUBLIC MOURNING FOR CHARLIE KIRK 'UNSETTLING'

Born JoAnne Deborah Byron (and later adopting the names of Joanne Chesimard and Shakur), the violent revolutionary was a member of the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army. In 1977, she killed New Jersey police officer Werner Foerster, 34, a U.S. Army Vietnam veteran who left behind a widow and a young son.........

© Fox News