William Watson: Armageddon postponed, now back to dairy quotas and CUSMA
Share this Story : Financial Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
William Watson: Armageddon postponed, now back to dairy quotas and CUSMA
We won't get a trade deal without dairy concessions and that means compensating farmers even if it's not legally required
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Now that Armageddon has been postponed for a couple of weeks, we might use the breathing space to think for a minute about more mundane matters, such as the future of Canada-United States trade, which is up for renegotiation just weeks from now.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
President Donald Trump was very gracious about Canada in his telephone chat with the four Artemis astronauts, including our own Jeremy Hansen. A president’s lot is such a varied one! Chatting with moon-travellers. Rescuing downed pilots. Kicking off the White House Easter egg hunt. Deciding the fate of civilizations.
Given the president’s overall annoyance with us, you might have thought he’d suggest to the three American astronauts they boot Hansen out of their Orion capsule and leave him on the far side of the moon. Instead he praised Hansen’s courage, bravery, brilliance and even genius, and did not ask him to confirm that from space you can’t actually see the Canada-U.S. border, which as Trump always insists, was just drawn on the map arbitrarily. So: good for the president.
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Will he be as kind, however, when it comes time to talk the details of trade? And what mood will he be in if the Iran denouement ends up solidifying the position of a new Iran government (not regime) that, though badly pummelled, ends up with explicit control of the Strait of Hormuz? Geography has always given Iran implicit control but only existential desperation has caused its exercise. It is not unknown for Trump to take out his frustrations by beating up on lesser powers, such as us.
The future shape of the North American car industry is one key issue in the CUSMA negotiations. Since 1965’s Auto Pact, parts and cars have crossed the border tariff-free so long as they satisfy content requirements. The Trump administration seems likely to want to reimpose permanent tariffs. A new study by three MIT economists suggests doing so would impose net costs on the U.S. economy, though mainly if the tariffs extend to parts.
The three — Luke Heeney, Jasdeep Mandia and Christopher R. Knittel — modelled the U.S. auto market in what, when you take into account all the different models and trims sold by more than three dozen manufacturers, is forbiddingly intricate detail. It’s also very transnational. Almost half of vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled abroad, while even those assembled in the U.S. use foreign parts. For the purposes of this study it’s interesting that Canada is not regarded as foreign: U.S. law only requires companies to report how much of their content originates from the U.S. and Canada together. That presumably will change after this summer.
William Watson: Open the highway, you crazy New Brunswickers!
William Watson: User-pay is a good principle for infrastructure
Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});
The MIT researchers found that a car-only tariff increases the market share of U.S. producers by a little under six per cent, which raises their profit by about US$1 billion — essentially nothing in a US$31-trillion economy. Consumers are worse off by US$14 billion but that’s offset by tariff revenue of the same amount. If you like consumers more than you do government employees, you’ll consider that a net loss — though government employees do include NASA astronauts and maybe that affects your balance-taking.
Doritos at US$7 a bag ended up costing PepsiCo billions Retail & Marketing
Doritos at US$7 a bag ended up costing PepsiCo billions
BYD to open 20 car dealerships in Canada this year Autos
BYD to open 20 car dealerships in Canada this year
Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});
Canadian pension plans are so healthy that employers are taking a contribution 'holiday,' says Mercer Retirement
Canadian pension plans are so healthy that employers are taking a contribution 'holiday,' says Mercer
Subscriber only. Saudi Arabia’s vital East-West oil pipeline attacked after ceasefire Subscriber only Financial Times
Subscriber only. Saudi Arabia’s vital East-West oil pipeline attacked after ceasefire
Facing the loss of government disability benefits, Ian wonders if CPP, OAS and a small inheritance will be enough Personal Finance
Facing the loss of government disability benefits, Ian wonders if CPP, OAS and a small inheritance will be enough
On the other hand, if the tariff is also imposed on imported parts, the cost to consumers doubles, though so do tariff revenues, while the US$1-billion gain to producers turns into a US$2.6-billion loss. Strangely, the loss falls more heavily on Chevrolet, GMC and Ford than on Honda and Toyota. Foreign content varies between 25 and 90 per cent across vehicles and it turns out these big U.S. firms rely on it more and so are hit harder. Who knew?
These details of tariff incidence in the U.S. auto industry aren’t likely to trouble President Trump. But he does know about Canadian dairy — which is to negotiations with Canada what uranium enrichment is to negotiations with Iran: i.e., no deal on dairy, no deal period.
A recent decision by the Quebec court of appeal on taxi licences may give Ottawa a little extra leverage in getting dairy farmers to go along with a reduction of tariffs on their U.S. competition. Montreal taxi drivers argued that reforms introduced in 2019 effectively destroyed the value of their taxi licences and so they were owed compensation for what amounted to policy-driven expropriation of their private property. A lower court agreed with them but now the court of appeal has sided with the government: governments have to be free to withdraw privileges previously granted even if doing so imposes an economic loss on beneficiaries of the status quo.
Dairy farmers holding quota that allows them to profit from the supply restrictions imposed by marketing boards are in exactly the same position as the taxi drivers were. It’s hard to imagine how the boards’ stranglehold on the industry will be eliminated without compensation. But the fact the government may not be legally bound to pay compensation probably increases its leverage over them at least slightly.
Needless to say, the taxi drivers are considering an appeal to the Supreme Court, which is not always sensible. So we’ll see if our dairy policy does finally come down to Earth or if, despite the weight of logic, Canadian cows continue to jump over that object Jeremy Hansen and his American colleagues just visited.
Share this Story : Financial Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
