At long last, the elders have cast their ballots, the conclave has dissolved, and a tastefully designed blue puff of smoke has risen above Apple Park. The long Tim Cook pontificate is over. In his place, an Apple insider named John Ternus has ascended.

Tim Cook was Apple’s first CEO after Steve Jobs, appointed as a trusted and steady hand with a lot of logistics experience. His mandate was to expand on a general vision that had, at the time of Jobs’s death, become fairly clear. Cook oversaw the company’s growth from around $350 billion in market capitalization to nearly $4 trillion today, which was the result, mostly, of delivering and gradually improving upon a line of devices that was, in 2011, freshly revamped and remains recognizable in today’s catalogue: a sharpened slablike iPhone, the iPad, the aluminum Macs and MacBooks, and marginal-for-the-time-being accessory devices like the Apple TV.

Jobs famously warned Cook not to fall into the trap of asking what the late founder would do, but the reality was that he didn’t really need to. He oversaw the launch of accessories like the Apple Watch and AirPods, which were major successes, as well as the Apple Vision Pro, which was an experimental flop. Mostly, he oversaw the expansion of a coherent hardware business with an enormous amount of room to grow, turning it into, at times, the largest company in the world. His largest contribution after that was probably his push into supplemental software and cloud services — iCloud, Apple Pay, Apple Music, and too many others to keep track of — which can be understood, in business terms, as ways to squeeze steady recurring revenue out of an already lucrative hardware business. Longtime Apple watcher-diviner John Gruber connects Cook’s legacy to the reputation of his successor, a 25-year Apple veteran and the company’s senior vice-president of hardware engineering:

Jobs made the right pick for his successor. And while only time will tell, it sure feels today like Cook has too. Cook has never been a product person and to his credit, he never once pretended to be. (That was [former Apple CEO] John Sculley’s downfall, in a nut.) With the table set by the budding iPhone and nascent iPad products Jobs left behind, Apple didn’t need a product person at the helm in the 2010s. They needed someone to let the existing products blossom and expand. Today, it feels to me like Apple needs a product guy at the helm again. Someone with the itch to spearhead the creation of new things. Of course Cook’s successor came from within the company’s ranks. And John Ternus, more than anyone else at the company, seems like that person.

Jobs made the right pick for his successor. And while only time will tell, it sure feels today like Cook has too. Cook has never been a product person and to his credit, he never once pretended to be. (That was [former Apple CEO] John Sculley’s downfall, in a nut.) With the table set by the budding iPhone and nascent iPad products Jobs left behind, Apple didn’t need a product person at the helm in the 2010s. They needed someone to let the existing products blossom and expand. Today, it feels to me like Apple needs a product guy at the helm again. Someone with the itch to spearhead the creation of new things. Of course Cook’s successor came from within the company’s ranks. And John Ternus, more than anyone else at the company, seems like that person.

This seems about right, in the big picture: Apple can continue to sell lots of iPhones and laptops but may have reached a bit of a plateau for that generation of hardware and services, and Ternus’s history as an engineer and device guy — as well as the tidy biographical detail that his only job before working at Apple was at a dot-com-era VR start-up — can be read as a sign that it’s time for some new hardware categories. But the focus on Cook’s long run of success at Apple also obscures real and recent shifts in sentiment around him, and Apple, in a disorienting moment for tech. The first concerns AI. For much of 2025, analysts and pundits gawked at the company’s attempts to figure out an AI strategy, which, after much fanfare, resulted in an insignificant set of relatively minor operating-system features, a few new widgets, and a Siri that couldn’t do much more than before, leading to calls for Cook to step down. Lately, this narrative has shifted a bit in the other direction: Perhaps Apple’s cautious, half-committed approach to AI spared it from the chance to vaporize hundreds of billions of dollars in a race that it was unlikely to win anyway. Either way, under Cook, Apple has seemed a bit adrift as far as AI is concerned.

The other big shift was more personally implicating: the return of Donald Trump. Plenty of tech CEOs seemed fine, or even eager, to enter into a semi-corrupt public arrangement with the second Trump administration, pledging political support — and making donations — to the cause. Cook, who had spoken out against the Trump administration’s immigration and environmental policies in 2017, found himself, in 2025, spending an awful lot of time publicly ingratiating himself to the president. In the service of tariff relief, he mustered public praise, made donations to the inauguration slush fund, and presented Trump with a golden memento of their relationship:

President Donald Trump announces Apple's $100 billion investment commitment in the U.S. as CEO Tim Cook presents a custom-engraved glass item with a 24-karat gold base in the Oval Office, August 2025. pic.twitter.com/XB44NfouSY— Future Adam Curtis B-Roll (@adamcurtisbroll) August 7, 2025

President Donald Trump announces Apple's $100 billion investment commitment in the U.S. as CEO Tim Cook presents a custom-engraved glass item with a 24-karat gold base in the Oval Office, August 2025. pic.twitter.com/XB44NfouSY

Cook, who stepped into the public eye as Steve Jobs’s soft-spoken supply-chain master, will leave his job as Tim Apple, his accomplishments commemorated by a breathtakingly and revealingly narcissistic — and not entirely inaccurate — late-career recap from the president:

pic.twitter.com/bpeFEgj0kI— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 21, 2026

pic.twitter.com/bpeFEgj0kI

Cook’s last big task, after years of understated communication about a straightforward story of growth, was to figure out how to insulate his company from — or align it with — a personalist administration that wants to insert itself into everything, creating a strange spectacle in the process. When Ternus takes over, Cook will move to a new role. “As executive chairman, Cook will assist with certain aspects of the company, including engaging with policymakers around the world,” the company said. His reward for a job well done, in other words, is to keep doing the part that made everyone mad.

Sign Up for John Herrman column alerts

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

Zuckerberg Is Trying to Figure Out What You’ll Pay Him For

The Industry of the Future Is Run by People Who Hate Each Other

Is the AI Cybersecurity Apocalypse Already Here?

© Daily Intelligencer