In the shadows of contemporary global politics, a specter looms large: the rise of populist nationalism and the ascent of authoritarian leaders to power. These trends, often underpinned by promises of revitalizing economies and restoring national pride, have shaken the foundations of established democratic norms. What’s perplexing is that the very economic ideology that gained traction over the past four decades in the West-neoliberalism was purported to strengthen democracy, not weaken it. So, what went wrong?
One critical aspect of this question lies in the economic realm: neoliberalism failed to deliver on its promises. Across the United States and other advanced economies that embraced neoliberal policies -characterized by government downsizing, tax cuts, and deregulation-per capita real income growth between 1980 and the COVID-19 pandemic paled in comparison to the preceding three decades. Moreover, income inequality soared as the top echelons prospered while those in the middle and at the bottom experienced stagnation, exacerbated by weakened social protections.
This disillusionment with neoliberalism is particularly acute among younger generations who witness the devastating impacts of climate change. They observe how neoliberal-leaning governments consistently prioritize corporate interests over environmental regulations, exacerbating crises such as pollution and public health emergencies like the opioid epidemic. These failures underscore a fundamental flaw in neoliberal doctrine: the blind faith in unfettered markets as the optimal path to societal prosperity.
From its inception, neoliberalism disregarded warnings from economists about the inefficiencies and instabilities of unregulated markets. The notion that expanding corporate freedoms would trickle down to benefit society at large has been debunked by mounting evidence. The freedom to pollute, for instance, translates into dire health consequences and environmental degradation, highlighting the inherent trade-offs that neoliberalism overlooks.
Similarly, neoliberal disdain for taxation as an infringement on individual liberty fails to acknowledge the indispensable role of government investment in fostering economic growth and societal well-being. Infrastructure, technology, education, and public health-all foundational pillars of modern society – owe their existence, in part, to government intervention. Yet, proponents of neoliberalism conveniently ignore this symbiotic relationship between private enterprise and public investment.
Consider the case of Elon Musk and Tesla, whose success was buoyed by significant government support, including a crucial lifeline from the Department of Energy. As Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes astutely noted, “Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.” Indeed, taxation is the lifeblood of governance, enabling the provision of essential public goods and services that benefit all members of society.
Critics of big government advocate for cuts in public expenditures, including social welfare programs and healthcare. However, such austerity measures disproportionately burden the most vulnerable, undermining societal cohesion and exacerbating inequalities. A society where access to healthcare and financial security in old age are privileges rather than rights is fundamentally flawed and less free for the majority.
Even the wealthiest among us stand to gain from a more equitable distribution of resources. The moral imperative to ensure every child has enough to eat and access to healthcare transcends individual wealth accumulation. By investing in the well-being of all citizens, societies lay the groundwork for sustainable prosperity and collective advancement.
As the world grapples with the consequences of neoliberal policies, the upcoming global elections serve as a critical juncture for reevaluation. In the United States, the choice between incumbent Joe Biden and his predecessor Donald Trump epitomizes the clash of economic philosophies and political visions. Biden’s commitment to leveraging governmental power for the betterment of all citizens contrasts sharply with Trump’s championing of crony capitalism and elitist interests.
At its core, this electoral contest represents a choice between two divergent paths: one characterized by integrity, compassion, and collective progress, and the other marred by self-interest, division, and regression. While political realities may never align perfectly with idealistic visions, the contrast in candidates’ values and policies is stark.
Recent polls suggest a troubling amnesia regarding the chaos and divisiveness of the Trump era. However, a closer examination of the candidates’ platforms reveals profound differences in their approaches to governance and societal well-being. If we aspire to build a society founded on trust, equality, and opportunity for all, the choice becomes clear.
Neoliberalism’s failure to deliver on its promises has fueled discontent and widened societal divides. As we stand at a crossroads in global politics, it is incumbent upon us to reassess our economic priorities and embrace policies that prioritize the common good over narrow self-interest. Only then can we truly uphold the principles of democracy and forge a path toward a more equitable and prosperous future for all.
Influence of neoliberalism in democracy and society in global elections
29
0
04.05.2024
In the shadows of contemporary global politics, a specter looms large: the rise of populist nationalism and the ascent of authoritarian leaders to power. These trends, often underpinned by promises of revitalizing economies and restoring national pride, have shaken the foundations of established democratic norms. What’s perplexing is that the very economic ideology that gained traction over the past four decades in the West-neoliberalism was purported to strengthen democracy, not weaken it. So, what went wrong?
One critical aspect of this question lies in the economic realm: neoliberalism failed to deliver on its promises. Across the United States and other advanced economies that embraced neoliberal policies -characterized by government downsizing, tax cuts, and deregulation-per capita real income growth between 1980 and the COVID-19 pandemic paled in comparison to the preceding three decades. Moreover, income inequality soared as the top echelons prospered while those in the middle and at the bottom experienced stagnation, exacerbated by weakened social protections.
This disillusionment with neoliberalism is particularly acute among younger generations who witness the devastating impacts of climate change. They observe how neoliberal-leaning governments consistently prioritize corporate interests over environmental........
© Blitz
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Donald Low
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
