Even after Tuesday evening’s nationally televised debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, too many Americans are still in the dark about Harris and her record … and it isn’t their fault.

The New York Times’ post-debate coverage said it well: “For weeks, undecided voters have been asking for more substance,” says the lead, pivoting to a recap of Harris’ first answer, and then continuing, “Some Americans might need more convincing.”

“More convincing,” indeed. Harris skipped the entire primary season. She didn’t campaign for the nomination, she had it handed to her by the Democrat Party’s elites, who worked behind the scenes to remove the presumptive nominee they had all publicly supported before he revealed his incompetence at a debate. They replaced him without a single voter casting a vote for her. Harris followed up by giving zero substance in her acceptance speech at her national convention. She evades serious questions. She’s been the presumptive nominee or the nominee of her party for almost two months, and until this week, her total exposure to questions from the media has consisted of one short softball interview – with her running mate by her side to bail her out if necessary.

In her debate with former President Donald Trump earlier this week, she evaded questions all night long. The ABC moderators did a terrible job as journalists – they asked her poorly phrased questions, then failed to follow up when she avoided answering them. While they........

© Townhall