Rights or Relief
The decision to repeal a long-standing rural employment guarantee and replace it with a new framework has reopened a fundamental debate about how India understands welfare, work, and federalism. What is being contested is not merely a scheme, but a philosophy that treated employment as a right rather than a discretionary benefit. For over a decade, the employment guarantee acted as a shock absorber for rural India. Its demand-driven design gave workers a legal claim on the state during periods of distress ~ whether caused by drought, agrarian slowdown, or economic shocks.
In doing so, it altered the relationship between citizen and government, embedding a rights-based approach into everyday governance. Its replacement with a centrally determined allocation model marks a decisive shift away from that idea. The Congress’s decision to mobilise on the streets reflects an understanding that this change cannot be fought only through........





















Toi Staff
Sabine Sterk
Penny S. Tee
Gideon Levy
Waka Ikeda
Mark Travers Ph.d
Grant Arthur Gochin
Tarik Cyril Amar