This is Part I of a series.

As mental health professionals (MHPs), our ethical codes suggest that we should prioritize our client’s welfare (ACA, 2014, s.A.1.a; NASW, 2021, s.1.01; APA, 2016, Principle B). The ethical principle of fidelity means that we keep our promises to clients, including our commitment to demonstrate respect for their dignity and worth, to honor their right to self-determination, and to act in a trustworthy manner (Barsky, 2023).

Sometimes, this means that we put our client’s interests above our own. Prioritizing the needs of our clients helps facilitate trusting work relationships with clients and protects people who may be in vulnerable situations. Although our primary professional obligation is to our clients, various professional organizations also recognize a professional obligation to engage in self-care (ACA, 2014, s.C; NASW, 2021, Purpose). This post explores the potential conflict between our ethical responsibilities to our clients and to ourselves when considering termination of work with clients to protect our psychological well-being. In particular, this post explores the risks of being held liable for malpractice when terminating work due to personal concerns experienced by MHPs.

Malpractice is a legal concept that defines a professional’s legal responsibility to........

© Psychology Today