Jang Daul
In the heart of Seoul, amidst the bustling streets and towering skyscrapers, a different kind of battle is being waged — one that resonates far beyond the borders of Korea. This battle is not waged with weapons or political rhetoric, but with the weight of legal arguments and the fervent determination of climate-concerned citizens, passionate activists and lawyers.
At the center of this struggle is Korea's Constitutional Court, which held the first public hearing of Asia's first climate lawsuit against the government’s climate target on April 23, with the next hearing scheduled for May 21, a watershed moment in the global fight against the climate crisis.
The genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020, when the first climate lawsuit was filed in Korea. Now, four consolidated lawsuits stand before the court, each representing a diverse array of plaintiffs united by a common cause: To hold the government accountable for its inadequate climate policies. From infants to children, teens, citizens and civil society activists, the plaintiffs represent a unified voice demanding climate justice and liability.
The crux of the plaintiffs’ argument rests on a fundamental premise: That climate change is not just an environmental issue, but a matter of constitutional rights. They contend that the government’s failure to address the climate crisis effectively in a timely manner infringes upon their right to life and a clean environment — an assertion bolstered by the Korean National Human Rights Commission’s declaration that climate change constitutes a human rights issue of paramount importance.
Central to the plaintiffs’ case is the disparity between Korea’s national greenhouse gas emission reduction goal and those of other industrialized nations. They argue that the government’s current policies fall woefully short of what is required to mitigate the catastrophic effects of climate change, citing scientific evidence and international legal precedents to support their claims. From inadequate emissions reduction targets to a reliance on fossil fuels, the government’s approach to climate action is deemed insufficient and incompatible with its constitutional obligations.
However, the government remains steadfast in its defense, citing the complexities of policymaking. While acknowledging the urgency of climate change, government officials argue that the judiciary should not encroach upon matters of policy and governance — a stance that sets the stage for a clash of legal doctrines and raises fundamental questions about the separation of powers.
As the courtroom drama unfolds, the eyes of the world are fixed upon Korea, recognizing the profound implications of this historic legal battle. The outcome of these lawsuits will reverberate across continents, shaping the future of climate action and holding governments accountable for their climate commitments. Indeed, Korea’s climate litigation is not just a domestic affair; it is a global rallying cry for climate justice and a testament to the power of grassroots activism in effecting change.
In recent years, climate litigation has emerged as a powerful tool for holding governments and corporations accountable for their contributions to climate change. From landmark rulings in Europe to groundbreaking lawsuits in the United States, courts around the world have increasingly recognized the urgent need for climate action and the legal obligations of governments to protect the environment and uphold human rights.
Korea’s climate litigation represents a significant milestone in this global movement for environmental justice. By challenging the government’s climate policies in court, plaintiffs are not only seeking redress for past injustices but also demanding systemic change to ensure a sustainable and equitable future for all. Their courage and determination serve as an inspiration to activists and advocates worldwide, galvanizing support for climate action and sparking meaningful conversations about the intersection of law, justice and the environment.
Beyond the legal arguments and constitutional debates lies a deeper truth — a truth that speaks to the moral imperative of safeguarding our planet for future generations. It is a truth embodied by the faces of the youth activists who stand as plaintiffs in this historic case — a generation that refuses to inherit a world ravaged by the climate crisis. Their voices echo a universal call to action, reminding us of our collective responsibility to protect humanity and our planet.
In the end, Korea’s climate litigation is not just about winning a legal battle; it is about winning the fight for humanity’s future. It is about affirming our commitment to climate justice and ensuring that the voices of the marginalized and the disenfranchised are heard and heeded. As the judges of the Constitutional Court deliberate and the plaintiffs await their verdict, one thing remains abundantly clear: The world is watching, and the time for action is now.
Jang Daul (daul.jang@greenpeace.org) is a government relations and advocacy specialist at Greenpeace East Asia Seoul Office. He is a guest editorial writer for The Korea Times.
World's eyes on Korea's climate litigation
80
0
15.05.2024
Jang Daul
In the heart of Seoul, amidst the bustling streets and towering skyscrapers, a different kind of battle is being waged — one that resonates far beyond the borders of Korea. This battle is not waged with weapons or political rhetoric, but with the weight of legal arguments and the fervent determination of climate-concerned citizens, passionate activists and lawyers.
At the center of this struggle is Korea's Constitutional Court, which held the first public hearing of Asia's first climate lawsuit against the government’s climate target on April 23, with the next hearing scheduled for May 21, a watershed moment in the global fight against the climate crisis.
The genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020, when the first climate lawsuit was filed in Korea. Now, four consolidated lawsuits stand before the court, each representing a diverse array of plaintiffs united by a common cause: To hold the government accountable for its inadequate climate policies. From infants to children, teens, citizens and civil society activists, the plaintiffs represent a unified voice demanding climate justice and liability.
The crux of the plaintiffs’ argument rests on a fundamental premise: That climate change is not just an environmental issue, but a matter of constitutional rights.........
© The Korea Times
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Belen Fernandez
Gideon Levy
Nikkei Editorial
Kenneth Cohen
Bernd Riegert
Patrick Gathara
Srecko Horvat
Ivan Lorenčič
