In the next two decades, the heirs of the world’s wealthiest are expected to become significantly richer. An estimated $84 trillion is expected to change hands by 2045 in what has been deemed the largest-ever transfer of intergenerational wealth—but not all billionaires are on board.

Thank you for signing up!

By clicking submit, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

Some, like Laurene Powell Jobs, have decided against leaving their fortunes to their children. Powell Jobs, whose multibillion-dollar net worth primarily consists of Apple (AAPL) and The Walt Disney Company (DIS) shares inherited from her late husband Steve Jobs, has previously stated that “it’s not right for individuals to accumulate a massive amount of wealth.” Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)’s Warren Buffett, meanwhile, has designed his will so that his children will inherit a charitable trust that must be doled out within a decade instead of receiving a mass amount of funds.

Perhaps the most notable example of the anti-inheritance billionaire is Chuck Feeney, an acclaimed philanthropist who died in October 2023 with only $2 million, despite having once accumulated a net worth nearly $8 billion. Feeney, who made a fortune in the duty-free shopping business, gave the bulk of his money away for decades via his Atlantic Philanthropies foundations. “It is eccentric, but he sheltered us from people using the money to treat us differently,” said one of Feeney’s five children in a 2007 interview. “It made us normal people.”

Here’s a look at some of the world’s wealthiest individuals who have decided not to offer inheritances to their kids:

As the founder of Facebook........

© Observer