Jamie Sarkonak: Alberta steps in again to protect Canada from Steven Guilbeault
The Liberals were told to respect provincial jurisdiction, but their update to the federal environmental assessment regime doesn't
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
On Thursday, the Alberta government announced that it has asked the Alberta Court of Appeal to provide an opinion on whether the newly amended federal Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is constitutional. The problem? The things that rendered much of the act unconstitutional, which had been pointed out by the Supreme Court last fall, were never addressed.
The flaw that tainted IAA 1.0 was one of jurisdictional blindness: the law didn’t keep the feds in their own lane, and instead gave Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault the ability to veto just about any infrastructure project he likes — even in-province pipelines and roads, as well as gravel pits and mines, which are all within provincial domain.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Don't have an account? Create Account
IAA 1.0 inserted a federal stake into these provincial projects by making Ottawa the master of any process that has the potential for “effects within federal jurisdiction” — that is, anything that could affect fisheries, migratory birds, Indigenous people, cross-border pollution, etc.
IAA 2.0 is about the same, but instead of mere........
© National Post
visit website