Every holiday season, I watch well-intentioned donors search for meaningful ways to address hunger. One of the more popular options is the "gift" of live farm animals to families in low-income countries. The imagery is powerful: smiling children hugging goats and cows, donors reassured they are giving something tangible and lasting. For many years, this narrative went largely unquestioned. But after two decades of working in hunger relief and climate advocacy, I believe this model does far more harm than good, and that plant-based giving offers a more effective, transparent, and compassionate alternative.

Concerns about livestock gifting are not fringe opinions. Prominent charity evaluators, food-security NGOs, and even Jane Goodall have urged donors to reconsider animal-based aid and explore more sustainable approaches. Those warnings reflect realities I have seen repeatedly: animals introduced into food-insecure regions require far more resources than most people realize, and the burden often falls on families already struggling to feed themselves.

Since the late 1990s and then through my work with A Well-Fed World, the global hunger relief and climate advocacy nonprofit I founded in 2009, I have advocated for improved practices in food security, highlighted the hidden costs of livestock gifting programs, and redirected funding toward smaller, plant-based organizations with low overhead and highly effective aid initiatives rooted in their own communities. This shift wasn't based on sentimentality; it was based on pragmatism and evidence.

A Well-Fed World's Plants-4-Hunger program channels resources directly to grassroots partners working on the ground. These organizations provide plant-based foods to........

© International Business Times