The agency needs to ditch woke, trim its budget, end serial resignations at the top and get back to collecting good, trustworthy data

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Anil Arora recently quit as chief statistician of Canada, saying “I wanted to leave the place a little bit better than I found it.” It’s far from clear he did. After many years with a pristine reputation, Statistics Canada is increasingly mired in controversy and poor leadership is a big reason why.

Chief statisticians are much more powerful than their limited public visibility might suggest. Statistics Canada’s ruling policy committee, composed of the chief and six assistant chief statisticians, functions much like former U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s wartime cabinet: after polling its members, who unanimously rejected the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln concluded: “Seven nays and one aye; the ayes have it.”

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Leaving abruptly under opaque circumstances is becoming a habit for chief statisticians. Wayne Smith resigned in 2016 in a petty squabble with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government over tech support, a selfless stand that drew no public or professional support. It is as likely his departure reflected a guilty conscience for having publicly defended the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS) that replaced the mandatory long-form Census in 2011.

Arora’s departure follows a pandemic hiring binge the government never authorized. Not surprisingly, it now expects Statistics Canada to downsize,........

© Financial Post