menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

United Nations Security Council: Power, Lapses, And Need For Change – OpEd

1 0
previous day

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) held its first session in 1946, and it is the primary body responsible for maintaining global peace and security. Born from the failures of the League of Nations, its foundational mission, as outlined in the United Nations (UN) Charter, is to prevent future global conflicts, foster cooperation among nations, and serve as a platform for conflict resolution. Unlike other UN organs, the UNSC’s resolutions are binding on member states, solidifying its pivotal role on the global stage.

The UNSC comprises 15 members: five permanent members (P5), China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, each holding veto power over substantive resolutions, and ten non-permanent members elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms without veto power. This inherent imbalance of authority, which has remained unchanged since the UNSC’s establishment, is a central point of contention for many emerging nations and donor countries, raising significant questions about fairness, equity, and the underrepresentation of key regions such as Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

The Council’s powers are extensive, encompassing the authority to investigate disputes, recommend solutions, authorize peacekeeping operations, impose sanctions, and even authorize military action. A resolution requires at least nine affirmative votes and, crucially, no veto from any of the P5 members. This structure, while allowing for decisive action, also creates significant potential tensions, particularly when national interests diverge. Nonetheless, the necessity of veto power is often debated, with both positive and negative factors associated with it.

Peacekeeping operations are a central instrument of the UNSC, deploying personnel to maintain stability, protect civilians, and support political transitions in conflict zones worldwide. Sanctions, permitted under Article 41 of the UN Charter, serve as another major tool. Article 41 mentions that the Security Council can take measures that do not involve the use of armed forces to maintain or restore international peace and security. These measures can include the interruption of economic relations, communication systems (like postal, telegraph, radio, etc.), and diplomatic relations. Essentially, Article 41 empowers the Security Council to impose sanctions and other non-military measures to compel compliance with its resolutions. These also include arms embargoes, and travel bans, asset freezes, and trade restrictions, aimed at pressuring actors before resorting to military force. However, sanctions often face criticism regarding their effectiveness and potential humanitarian consequences. The Council also plays a crucial role in counterterrorism efforts, particularly against groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, through targeted sanctions and mandated operations. Such counterterrorism efforts are........

© Eurasia Review