Opinion: Minority trumps majority for UCP on separation question Albertans won’t get a say on whether their government should hold a vote on leaving Canada unless they support having one. That’s how the question will be decided under the United Conservative Party government.
Share this Story : Edmonton Journal Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Opinion: Minority trumps majority for UCP on separation question
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Albertans won’t get a say on whether their government should hold a vote on leaving Canada unless they support having one. That’s how the question will be decided under the United Conservative Party government.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters.
Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account.
Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters.
Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account.
Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
Last week, Premier Danielle Smith announced a provincial referendum ballot on Oct. 19, to hear from Albertans on nine questions relating to provincial immigration and improving Alberta’s place in Canada. A 10th question about exiting the country may be added if separatist organizers of the current citizen petition rolling across Alberta collect enough signatures from supporters.
Typically, voters get a say about whether a separation question should be asked. British prime minister David Cameron committed to holding the Brexit vote in his party’s 2015 successful election campaign and delivered a vote the following year.
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
In Quebec, premiers René Lévesque and Jacques Parizeau sought and won mandates for the referendums their governments held in 1980 and 1995, respectively. The Parti Québécois under leader Pierre Plamondon, widely expected to win the province’s next election (another provincial vote set for October) has promised a referendum on separating in his party’s first term. But under the UCP government, this won’t happen.
Instead, a motivated minority of separation-minded citizens will decide if the question gets added to the ballot. How is it that signatures can serve as a proxy for a majority of votes?
The answer is Alberta’s Citizen Initiative Act. Framed as direct democracy when it was introduced by premier Jason Kenney in 2021, the act allows eligible Alberta voters to use petitions to rally support for advancing specific policy, legislative or constitutional issues they do not see on the governing agenda of the party in power.
Relying on a citizen petition to decide whether to hold a provincial separation vote is flawed for two reasons. The first is obvious but critical: Petitions only count support. This matters if you believe every eligible Alberta voter should have a say about whether a separation vote should proceed. If Albertans disagree with holding a vote, a petition provides no way for them to register their opposition.
You might think the second flaw is sample size, that the number of signatures required to trigger a vote is too low relative to the gravity of deciding whether to pose such an enormous and consequential question. Many would likely agree. But representing the will of a majority of Albertans was never the point of the citizen initiative legislation.
Rather, the intent was the opposite: a grassroots measure to give minority opinions a voice, as the separation petition clearly demonstrates. There isn’t nearly enough support for separation in the province for a majority of Albertans to give the UCP government a mandate to hold a vote. So, to placate activist separatists in their party aggrieved at Ottawa, the UCP amended the citizen initiative legislation twice last year to give these members a very good shot at holding one.
Same old Edmonton Oilers: bleeding goals against and losing games Sports
Same old Edmonton Oilers: bleeding goals against and losing games
Player grades: Edmonton Oilers with rancid unravelling to lose to Anaheim Ducks Cult of Hockey
Player grades: Edmonton Oilers with rancid unravelling to lose to Anaheim Ducks
Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});
Audit finds some city employees issuing and redeeming own gift cards Local News
Audit finds some city employees issuing and redeeming own gift cards
Edmonton Oilers bring back top PK specialist to the team Cult of Hockey
Edmonton Oilers bring back top PK specialist to the team
Alberta's immigration referendum casts 'great cloud' for investors but big landlords shrug Business
Alberta's immigration referendum casts 'great cloud' for investors but big landlords shrug
That second flaw? Reverse tyranny. If petition organizers get enough signatures, a minority will have been empowered to impose their will on a majority, inverting the intent of the citizen initiative legislation.
Under the amended act, organizers must collect at least 177,732 signatures for their separation petition to be successful. This is equal to 10 per cent of the number of voters who cast ballots in the last provincial election. Alberta last went to the polls in 2023, and three million Albertans were eligible to vote in that contest. This means that fewer than five per cent of eligible voters could determine whether a separation question appears on the referendum ballot in October.
Citizen petitions may be appropriate for ordinary policy matters. But holding a vote on Alberta separating from Canada would rank among the most consequential acts to have ever occurred in our democracy. As we have seen from the headlines generated last month, even talking about holding a vote on separating threatens Canada’s stability and roils politics at every level inside Alberta.
The UCP’s approach to deciding whether to add a question to the October referendum ballot demonstrates how it’s not them who are paying the price for the commitment the party made to separatist members. Rather, it’s costing Albertans a critical say in the future of their province.
Matt Gray is a Calgary-based senior communications strategist and the founder and principal of GrayPoint Communications Advisory Inc.
We invite you to write letters to the editor. A maximum of 150 words is preferred. Letters must carry a first and last name, or two initials and a last name, and include an address and daytime telephone number. All letters are subject to editing. We don’t publish letters addressed to others or sent to other publications. Email: letters@edmontonjournal.com
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the news you need to know — add EdmontonJournal.com and EdmontonSun.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal |The Edmonton Sun.
Share this Story : Edmonton Journal Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
