As Pakistan steps into critical discussions with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), it’s confronting immense financial pressures while simultaneously holding strategies that could fundamentally change its fortunes: the promise of export-led growth as well as an immense potential in much enhanced agricultural produce.

With a debt-to-GDP ratio that has breached the 70% threshold, Pakistan’s economic journey is overshadowed by the enormity of its debt—60% of it being domestic, bearing the brunt of 85% of the interest payments. This situation paints a vivid picture of the fiscal tightrope the country walks on.**

Yet, why turn to the IMF when an untapped potential lies within? Pakistan’s industrial, agriculture and tech sectors are a beacon of hope, resilience and demonstrate vast capabilities. This scenario presents a compelling case: while Pakistan seeks the IMF’s support, its flourishing textile exports, agriculture sector that can produce surplus and a growing tech sector signify an inherent strength and capacity for economic self-reliance.

This juxtaposition of external financial assistance and the potential for home-grown economic revival underscores a critical question — why rely on the IMF when there’s a path to harnessing export-driven growth towards financial independence?

While Pakistan has got other ways to bring in cash, like remittances from abroad or foreign investments, they’re not going to be the game-changer we need anytime soon. Various studies such as the study by Perez-Saiz, H., Dridi, J., Gursoy, T., & Bari, M. (2019) suggests that remittances do not automatically boost a country’s overall economy as much as we might think. While families receiving this money do end up spending more, this spending doesn’t lead to economic growth. The researchers found that whether these remittances help the economy depends a lot on how different parts of the economy are connected. This means that just getting more remittances doesn’t necessarily make the economy stronger. Moreover, the consensus in academic research is that remittances lead to inflation as they increase aggregate demand via higher household income, resulting in increased consumption.

So, we’re left facing some tough choices. From July to February, Pakistan’s exports are consistently trailing behind imports, painting a picture of a trade imbalance. In February alone, the figures are quite telling: exports stand at a modest $2.57 billion, while imports loom at a hefty $4.28 billion (Source: SBP). This substantial gap signals an urgent call to action for enhancing export capabilities to match or even overtake the towering import figures. Remittances, though stable, do not compensate for this disparity, highlighting the critical need for bolstering Pakistan’s export sector to improve the trade scenario. But, there’s a silver lining. With the right push and a bit of creativity, exports can be our ticket to turning things around. It’s not just about selling more, but selling smarter, tapping into a world that wants what we have to offer. For example, Pakistan’s high agricultural import bill could be significantly reduced by revamping the agri-sector to produce self-sufficiency and a sizeable exportable surplus, leveraging initiatives like Special Investment Facilitation Council........

© Business Recorder