For decades, American politicians and the elite intelligentsia have pushed the United States into a role of global enabler, using taxpayer dollars to fund institutions that often undermine US interests. President Donald Trump’s administration has made significant strides in reversing this trend, but much more remains to be done to disentangle the United States from ineffective, wasteful, and anti-American international organizations.

To clarify, Trump is not an isolationist. As a leader who recognizes the United States’ unparalleled position as the world’s foremost military and economic power, he understands the importance of international engagement. However, Trump also recognizes that America’s role on the global stage must have clearly defined rules and limits. This includes withdrawing support from organizations that are either hostile to US interests or ineffective in achieving their stated missions.

One of Trump’s earliest and most high-profile moves to challenge the status quo came with NATO. For years, NATO’s European members, particularly Germany, have failed to meet their financial obligations to the alliance, relying heavily on the United States to foot the bill for collective defense. Trump’s demands for these nations to contribute more-at least 2 percent of their GDP to defense, with a push for 5 percent -were met with skepticism and resistance. Yet, his blunt approach was a wake-up call for many European leaders, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine highlighted the urgent need for robust defense capabilities.

Despite some progress, most NATO members continue to fall short. If these nations refuse to meet their obligations, Trump’s suggestion of forming a new alliance with countries willing to share the burden equitably should be seriously........

© Blitz