On October 1, the stage was set for what could be the last major political debate before the highly anticipated US presidential election on November 5. This time, the spotlight was on the vice-presidential candidates-Republican JD Vance and Democrat Tim Walz-who engaged in a cordial yet critical discussion of the issues shaping the country. Unlike the heated presidential debates earlier this year, this 90-minute exchange on CBS News in New York adopted a more measured and respectful tone. Both candidates defended their party’s platforms while exchanging barbs aimed at their respective running mates, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

The debate, while civil, offered key insights into the dynamics of this election and the candidates’ readiness for office. While both men articulated their positions clearly, JD Vance seemed to benefit from his calm demeanor and polished speaking skills, offering a contrast to Walz, who found his footing later in the debate.

The conversation between Vance and Walz stood out for its relative restraint compared to the earlier, more contentious presidential debates. Much of the debate focused on key issues important to voters, such as immigration, abortion, the Capitol riot, and gun control. However, despite its civility, the debate was not without sharp exchanges, particularly on issues surrounding the legacy of Donald Trump.

Walz, the current governor of Minnesota, started the debate somewhat haltingly, struggling to find his rhythm when addressing foreign policy issues such as the recent Iranian missile attack on Israel. Foreign policy has never been Walz’s strong suit, and his discomfort on this topic was palpable. Meanwhile, Vance-a US Senator from Ohio-projected confidence, delivering smooth, on-message responses that aligned closely with Trump’s populist........

© Blitz