LETTERS: A lost opportunity for P.E.I. water governance and other letters
Share this Story : PNI Atlantic News Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
LETTERS: A lost opportunity for P.E.I. water governance and other letters
Subscribe now to access this story and more:
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Subscribe or sign in to your account to continue your reading experience.
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Create an account or sign in to continue your reading experience.
Access additional stories every month
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in our commenting community
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
In P.E.I.’s 2021 Water Act, in the 2022 irrigation strategy, and in a 2024 standing committee recommendation, our provincial government has repeatedly stated the need for a more participatory approach to overseeing water policy and governance. Despite the real need for a dedicated water governance body, our government decided that the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) might be able to fill this water governance role.
Members of the Coalition for the Protection of P.E.I. Water were recently invited to work with the government and develop new terms of reference for the EAC. The coalition developed terms of reference that would satisfy the goals of the act, the irrigation strategy, and the standing committee recommendation.
Unfortunately, our ideas were........
