Listen to this article:

The 2026 West Bengal assembly elections were not simply a contest between the Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party. It represents something qualitatively different –  a situation where the ruling party of an elected state government finds itself fighting simultaneously against a political opponent and the institutional apparatus of the Indian state. The cumulative weight of decisions by the Election Commission, central investigative agencies, central armed forces, and a deferential judiciary has made this arguably the most interventionist state election in post-Emergency Indian history.

SIR: Disenfranchisement by design

The most consequential instrument of this intervention has been the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The SIR removed around 90 lakh names from the rolls –  roughly 12% of the electorate. Over 60 lakh were categorised as absentee or deceased, while the status of 27 lakh remained pending before tribunals. Roughly 65% of those under adjudication were Muslims, with Dalit (Namasudra) Hindus from the Matua community also significantly affected. Women from poorer sections are another targeted group. 

The ECI framed this as routine “purification,” but West Bengal was treated as a special case without statistical basis – 30 observers deployed here against just four in Uttar Pradesh, 8,000 micro-observers in Bengal and none elsewhere, 95% of all officer transfers across India in this one state. This cannot be explained administratively, and can only be explained politically.

The SIR also inverted a foundational democratic principle. By shifting the burden of proof onto voters – requiring them to affirmatively establish their eligibility through documentation – the exercise overturned the presumption of enfranchisement that underlies any genuinely democratic process. The constituency-level data makes the targeting unmistakable: in Nandigram, where Muslims are 25% of the population, over 95% of deleted names were Muslim; in Bhabanipur, where Muslims constitute 20% of voters, 40% of those deleted were Muslim. The exercise was also never presented as neutral by those who designed its political logic. A BJP leader in the Union government explicitly declared that one crore Muslim infiltrators would be removed from the voters’ list. Basically, the ECI provided institutional cover; the BJP-Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh provided the mandate.

SIR: Above and beyond the constitutional mandate

The SIR has no clear legal basis. The term ‘special intensive revision’ does not appear anywhere in the Representation of the People Act. Section 21(3) of the RPA permits a special revision only for a constituency or part of a constituency – not an entire state. The qualifying date used has no statutory foundation either. Article 324, which grants the ECI broad superintendence over elections, is not a reservoir of unlimited power – the ECI must act according to law where law exists, and can act independently only where law is silent. The RPA is not silent but the SIR simply ignores it.

The logical contradictions are equally damning. The ECI justified the exercise on demographic changes accumulated over 20 years – yet compressed it into weeks, months before a scheduled election, rather than earlier, as both law and common sense requires. 

Buried within the process was a category called “logical discrepancy” – a vague administrative classification applied to voters whose papers were otherwise in order, allowing their names to be flagged for deletion without any clear evidentiary standard. It is through this category that the exercise shed its bureaucratic cover most completely: a valid document could be held against you if an official deemed something internally inconsistent. The burden of disproving an official’s judgment fell on the voter, not the other way around.

We must remember that the RPA provides only for determining ordinary residency – not citizenship. By requiring voters to establish citizenship through legacy linkage and documentary chains, the ECI has conducted a citizenship audit it has no legal authority to conduct. The SIR was not roll maintenance. It was an NRC by another name – invented, designed, and executed by the ECI alone.

The Arithmetic of targeted deletion

The SIR’s consequences map with striking precision onto the seats BJP won by the thinnest margins in 2021. Of 57 seats........

© The Wire