Children in many cultural contexts have rich social lives that do not include playing with adults.

In many contexts, culturally important age hierarchies dictate norms for family and social interactions.

Early Childhood Development interventions are implemented globally, but based only on Western data and norms. 

Meddling with how other groups parent their children echoes past misdeeds such as "Indian" boarding schools.

In Southern Madagascar, Gabriel Scheidecker observed Bara children playing. He was struck by their elaborate games. A group of 3- and 4-year-olds recreated a bilo, the possession ceremony that is a key psycho-social healing technique for this pastoralist community. One child took the role of the healer, two took the roles of those possessed by spirits, and the others sang and clapped in the distinctive rhythms used to induce the state of possession.

Bara children have rich, playful social lives among other children in the villages. This cohort of age mates, including many cousins and siblings, will grow up to be economically intertwined throughout their lives, herding and subsistence farming together. Their play thus serves many purposes. It facilitates mental, physical, and social development, as is the case for children around the world, it establishes bonds among peers with whom one’s economic life will unfold, and it includes developing local skills and knowledge, such as the songs and steps to perform the bilo.

The engrossing lives of Bara children occur in a context of family role norms that differ markedly from the expectations of Western families today. As in most places around the world and probably through the span of human history, it is considered inappropriate for Bara parents to play games with or to speak at length to a child. Adults are warmly present, providing attentive, nurturing physical care. Children are lovingly fed, washed, nursed through sickness, and protected from all possible harm. But Bara parents do not see themselves as a source of entertainment. For one thing, they are busy working and caring for the family and elders. For another, such behavior would disrupt important age hierarchies.

Age hierarchies are central to the economic, social, and emotional fabric of societies across Africa and beyond. They cement the commitment of young people to contribute to the local community and to care for elders later in life, essential in contexts where no public pension system is available. They also provide a system of coordination where families and larger kin networks are economic units. This is analogous to the needs of corporations and universities in the West, which are also typically hierarchical. In general, family structures the world over are best understood as culturally-transmitted systems adapted and attuned to the social and economic context.

“Early Childhood Development” Interventions Impose Contemporary Western Values

All over the world right now, however, local family structures are being disrupted by the Early Childhood Development (ECD) interventions of European and North American non-governmental organizations (NGOs; aka non-profit organizations). Parents are taught by such programs that their caregiving is inadequate or even harmful. For children’s brains to develop properly, parents must play with their children themselves and provide educational toys.

There are many problematic aspects of ECD interventions. For one, they are based on biased science. As in other domains of psychology, the studies that define our understanding of normal development and adequate child-rearing were conducted almost solely with Western children, and perspectives from the rest of the world face a higher bar to publish. For example, as Heidi Keller has detailed, attachment theory represents a Western middle-class perspective, ignoring the caregiving values and practices in the majority of the world, while claiming universality in its components and implying a moral judgment of other parenting practices.

ECD interventions also produce and disseminate unjustified deficit claims about populations in the Global South, placing blame on disadvantaged families while leaving unaddressed the structural conditions that generate global inequality. Furthermore, these interventions and their underlying research are funded largely by corporate foundations such as the Lego foundation, where there could be concerns about a conflict of interest.

ECD interventions disrupt age hierarchies both by reshaping the role of children in the family systems and by treating parents like children who need Western education to fulfill their roles. Local knowledge, the priorities parents have for their children’s development, culturally adjusted socialization strategies, and the web of lifespan needs that local norms evolved to meet are largely disregarded.

ECD interventions ignore that children in many contexts around the world, particularly in rural contexts, play with and explore the real world around them and the objects in it, and that there are children's cultures of transforming local materials into toys. They elevate the importance of toys related to specific cognitive skills, for example manipulating square symmetrical objects. Other kinds of locally valued skills, and the social responsibility that might be most highly valued, are disregarded.

Perhaps most concerning is that these interventions sometimes occur in coercive contexts, where it is difficult for parents to decline or avoid participation. For example in Ethiopia, parenting interventions targeted Borana pastoralists who had taken refuge in a displaced-persons camp during a severe drought. Many parents feared that refusing might jeopardize access to food.

Echoes of Past Injustices

There are echoes of past wrongs here. For example, this brings to mind how the Nestlé corporation increased markets for baby formula in Africa by sending sales representatives dressed as nurses to distribute samples, which were free long enough for a mother’s milk to dry up, then had to be purchased at sometimes unaffordable costs.

There are also echoes of the “Indian boarding schools” that sought to dismantle Native American culture. At the time, the practice was justified by similar arguments as ECD interventions today, and similarly, many people involved probably believed they were protecting or enhancing opportunities for vulnerable children. Looking back, we wish they had sought to understand local practices and reflected on their own ethnocentrism.

Psychologists certainly aim to do better now, for example, as seen in the American Psychological Association’s 2023 offer of apology to First Peoples in the United States and 2021 offer of apology to people of color. But sadly, in studying only Western children, then assuming universal relevance, developmental psychologists are unwittingly involved in this new form of psychological colonialism.

To be aligned with efforts to right past wrongs, psychologists must think critically and learn about local culture before implementing interventions of any kind. Research that takes the knowledge and perspectives of parents and families around the world seriously, and approaches local practices with curiosity, is essential for a better scientific understanding of childhood development. It can also allow psychologists and educators to develop forms of support aligned with real needs and that build on the strengths of families and communities.

Cone, L., Knudsen, H., & Rasmussen, L. R. (2026). Affective philanthropy and the im/possibility of governance: the LEGO Foundation’s involvement in public education. Journal of Education Policy, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2026.2647074

Draper, C. E., Barnett, L. M., Cook, C. J., Cuartas, J. A., Howard, S. J., McCoy, D. C., ... & Yousafzai, A. K. (2023). Publishing child development research from around the world: An unfair playing field resulting in most of the world's child population under‐represented in research. Infant and child development, 32(6), e2375. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2375

Keller, H. (2016). Psychological autonomy and hierarchical relatedness as organizers of developmental pathways. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0070

Keller, H. (2018). Universality claim of attachment theory: Children’s socioemotional development across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11414-11419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720325115

Morelli et al. (2018). Bringing the real world into developmental science: A commentary on Weber, Fernald, and Diop (2017). Child Development, 89(6), e594-e603.

Morelli, G., Quinn, N., Chaudhary, N., Vicedo, M., Rosabal-Coto, M., Keller, H., ... & Takada, A. (2018). Ethical challenges of parenting interventions in low-to middle-income countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(1), 5-24.

Scheidecker, et al (2021). How overstated scientific claims undermine ethical principles in parenting interventions. BMJ Global Health, 6(9).

Scheidecker, G. (2025). Beyond parents: The social world of early childhood and its developmental significance. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05768-6

Scheidecker, G., Chaudhary, N., Keller, H., Mezzenzana, F., Lancy, D, F. (2023). “Poor brain development” in the global South? Challenging the science of early childhood interventions. Ethos, 51, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12379

Scheidecker, G., Chaudhary, N., Oppong, S., Röttger-Rössler, B., & Keller, H. (2022). Different is not deficient: Respecting diversity in early childhood development. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 6(12), e24-e25. 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00277-2

Serpell, R. (2011). Social responsibility as a dimension of intelligence, and as an educational goal: Insights from programmatic research in an African society. Child Development Perspectives, 5(2), 126–133. https://academic.oup.com/cdpers/article-abstract/5/2/126/8234835

Singh, L., Cristia, A., Karasik, L. B., Rajendra, S. J., & Oakes, L. M. (2023). Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development. Infancy, 28(4), 708-737. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/infa.12545

Wako, W. (2025). When parents speak and practitioners listen: A bottom-up workshop on early childhood interventions among Borana Pastoralists, Ethiopia. Semi-Structured, 1(1), online.

Weber et al (2021). Africa is not a museum: the ethics of encouraging new parenting practices in rural communities in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ global health, 6(7).

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.

By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

© Psychology Today